"It seems more and more than in this community, people are
avoiding *payment* more than wanting *freedom*. "
In that case, i would have suggested releasing it as "freeware"; i don't know
which term could emphasize the freedom aspect more than "free software".
So how do you come to this absurd conclusion?
"Trisquel is free. GNU is free. Linux is Free. That's enough."
It's not; *every* piece of software existing on this planet should be free as
in freedom, because every single bit of proprietary software is an injustice,
designed to take away users freedom, and this should _never_ be done.
By the way, linux isn't free; it contains proprietary blobs.
"No need to
force the non-free into freedom."
That's - by our definition of freedom - a silly statement by itself. Freedom
means "having control over your own life", so by definition, you can't be
forced into freedom; otherwise, the state achieved in the end would not be
freedom.
