I think that's an overly technical distinction, and not particularly
relevant. The point is that dependencies on both of these cause programs to
not work on some systems without specific efforts to make them work (a
real-world example in the case of X is Mac OS X, which from my understanding
has some sort of compatibility layer to cope with this), and both are a
result of programmers deciding that's an acceptable loss given the API they
gain access to.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Could systemd be an inconven... danigaritarojas
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Could systemd be an inconvenient on ... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Could systemd be an inconvenient... danigaritarojas
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Could systemd be an inconvenient on p... taiji_tao
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Could systemd be an inconvenient... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Could systemd be an inconven... marioxcc . MT
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Could systemd be an inco... onpon4
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Could systemd be an inconvenien... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Could systemd be an inconvenient... danigaritarojas
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Could systemd be an inconvenient on p... taiji_tao
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Could systemd be an inconvenient on p... taiji_tao
