> Now that have a lot more sense to me than just Because it's not your place
to tell me what I can do with my property. The second one kind of reject any
copyright law and even conditions like "give appropriate credit whenever is
changed or shared".
Look, I know you're trying to pick apart my arguments for small
inconsistencies, and maybe they do exist. I'm only human. But please, this is
not constructive.
Copyleft licenses aren't the endgame. Copyleft licenses exist to create a
power balance while copyright exists. I know it's not the perfect
philosophical choice, but the perfect philosophical choice is suicidal.
Sometimes you have to do something pragmatic. Copyleft is that pragmatism in
action.
> I think...
I already know that your opinion on copyright and artistic works is a carbon
copy of RMS's. You don't need to repeat it. It would be nice if you would
actually justify that opinion, though.
