That doesn't mean that using Ubuntu is a problem. You can use Ubuntu without proprietary software very easily, because Canonical has separated out proprietary software into distinct repositories (for the most part). But that's not a legitimate reason to think of Ubuntu as completely libre.
Yes, but the "restricted" repository is an officially supported repository.
It's a part of Ubuntu, unless you're going to be pedantic and say that
nothing is really part of Ubuntu unless it's on the live CD. Such a
distinction is meaningless. The whole point of the repositories is to use
them.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Free GNU/Linux dist... sitereg
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Free GNU/Linux dist... albertoefg
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Free GNU/Linux dist... sitereg
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Free GNU/Linux dist... alejandrohp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Free GNU/Linux... sitereg
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Free GNU/L... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Free G... sitereg
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Fr... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Free G... alejandrohp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Free G... alejandrohp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Free GNU/Linux... mnaus
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquelize other non-Free GNU/Linux dist... mnaus