If you want to get something straight you should read it straight. You
interpret, modify it and then ask what is wrong. The answer is: your process
"I *accuse* person X of having a serious mental disorder" or "I *blame*
others for writing free software" is different from:
"Protecting forum posts with copyright and licenses is insanity. If 2 people
communicate by handling a copyright notice and a license for what they share
this is not a moral stance but a serious mental disorder."
> Where are the programs that you released under the public domain?
and it is not "releasing under" but rather sharing some useful settings. Just
like one shares with a friend "Look, if you use this towel you can wipe your
window and see better". It is in no way enforcing regulation on how (not) to
use the towel, who is the legal entity releasing the towel and all that
Forums are not the place to "release" software. Just like you don't write a
piece of code on the wall in a public toiled and put a license note on it
just because there is a "legal perspective" to it.
If one is serious to release software, there are proper ways to do it. That
was the idea of having a repo about it. But since people here would rather
sit and evaluate, criticize, argue, or take care mainly about the perfect
conformity to some ideology disregarding any call for healthy common sense, I
don't think any further sharing by me would be valuable because I refuse any
kind of sectarian thinking.