I would like to see them case by case basis, save "steering" users to non-free solutions, or subtle incompatibilities between DFSG and certain licenses (IIRC some man pages and other documentation were incompatible with DFSG and had to be moved into non-free repository, while they were actually free). Such minor, even pedantic, incompatibilities shouldn't be a deciding factor in gaining FSF endorsement, I think. Of course it is just how *I* think. FSF apparently thinks otherwise.
> However ADFENO affirms that "even Debian's "main" repository has some GNU
FSDG issues".
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why is Trisquel 8 taking ... Mason Hock
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why is Trisquel 8 tak... greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why is Trisquel 8... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why is Trisqu... greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why is T... Mason Hock
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why is T... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why is Trisqu... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Why is ... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why ... ar018
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Why... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why ... ar018
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Re :... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Why... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Re :... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why ... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why is Trisquel 8... ar018
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Why is Trisquel 8 taking so lo... calmstorm