*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
Hi David,
The universe is telling you that you can not create. RI is
demonstrating that you can. So whether you create little balls around
you or large new political systems - you are being creative.
I don't somehow think you should restrict yourself to opposites of
what you were time-breaking.
You speak of running out incidents? Just note that in TROM you are
knocking out TIME. You are NHOT addressing the incident. In Dianetics
the approach is to move to the incident and then run through it. In
TROM you paste the past into NOW or (PT) present time.
I would advise that you FIRST ensure you are in PT. --- You know! Be
aware of your body sitting on the chair - your feet on the floor -
feel the desk - and then check your head is where it should be. etc ;-)
Then - when in PT - pick up a something from the past and paste it
into PT. If you can't bring the whole into PT - take a smaller part of it.
I often start thinking of some past conflicting postulate (CP). Then
check PT and when I go to look at the CP - I find I am chuckling or
laughing at it.
What is the Direct reception method?
Regards,
Martin
At 2/08/2010 Monday 00:07, David wrote:
*************
The following message is relayed to you by [email protected]
************
I think I cogged on what repair of importances means or should
mean. What RI means is one of the mysteries of TROM for
many. RI s is one of the first brain fucks.
This is what I think it means.
Suppose you ran out incidents that had the condition or
postulate ( program ) of:
I am stupid.
The RI would be ( might be ) ( the ideal replacement postulate ) :
I am very mentally sharp and intelligent.
If you ran out :
I am ugly.
The RI would be:
I am beautiful.
If you ran out:
I am dishonest.
The RI would be:
I always operate with full honesty and integrity.
( If necessary define honesty and integrity for yourself by looking
it up in a dictionary. )
Etc. etc. .
Doing RI s means mentally placing these new desired postulates in
a spherical space around you.
To those who claim to understand TROM , am I correct?
If not , please correct me.
Now on to resolving the next riddle or mystery.
This one has taken me over a year to resolve.
TROM , in the way it is written , is not a bona fide clearing process.
Bona fide means without fraud or deceit.
It may contain a good clearing process, but is not a good clearing
process, it is cleverly hidden in amongst various lies and traps
and mysteries.
Those who say it is clearly written are intellectually and
perceptually dishonest.
Something clearly written means that the subject can be clearly
understood in at most three or four reads.
The energy that even comes off the TROM words tends to fog and numb the mind.
In contrast to the Direct Perception Method process which gives a
clear and refreshing feeling like a breath of fresh air.
David
On 1-Aug-10, at 5:05 PM, Martin Foster wrote:
*************
The following message is relayed to you
by <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
************
Some more info Mike:
PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR'S BULLETIN
>From L. RON HUBBARD
Via Hubbard Communications Office
163 Holland Park Avenue, London W.11
18 February 1955
STRAIGHT WIRE
excerpt:
The entire text of Self Analysis, in its original edition now available
from the Foundation in Phoenix, is devoted to rehashing the
preclear's past to
show him that it is not quite as dangerous as it is made out to be, and that
it won't bite him if he remembers some things about it.
From this form of Straight Wire we go into a more complicated form as
given in Self Analysis in Scientology, a converted edition of the original
Self Analysis. The edition is converted, by the way, simply by substituting
everywhere in its text for the word "recall" the word "mock up." Simply by
substituting "mock up" in the directions at the beginning of each list, one
has a modern Self Analysis.
At 1/08/2010 Sunday 22:02,
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] wrote:
Hi maybe you guys can shed a little light on this subject. The
self Analysis book as well as many other self help books I have
seen have long lists that start as "Recall as time when" and then
proceeds to state a happy or pleasurable event in your past. What
is the actual effect of sitting a doing these lists? Just to get
you to remember happy times or does it have a more permanent
(rewiring) of the brain which actually makes one happier by
constantly remembering happy moments for the past? Thanks you
for your insights!!
The book, I think, gives the answer to your question - but here's
mine anyway.
The more theta you have - the easier you are able to confront and
handle the reactive mind. Running pleasure moments increases your
theta level and therefore increases ability and confront.
You could also try "mocking up" pleasure moments. I read somewhere
that the first SA book used "mock up" processing and that due to
copyright issues the "recall" SA was then published.
Mocking up aligns with TROM'S Repair of Importances. (RI) - My
personal view is that RI is more effective if "Importances" are
used in the process and not just objects.
Martin
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3043 - Release Date:
08/01/10 08:34:00
_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
