*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
Hi Martin


Hi David,

The universe is telling you that you can not create. RI is demonstrating that you can. So whether you create little balls around you or large new political systems - you are being creative.


Yes.

I don't somehow think you should restrict yourself to opposites of what you were time-breaking.


To me it only seems most logical to replace a negative postulate that has been TBen with an optimum postulate.

But you can do what you think it is best for you.



You speak of running out incidents? Just note that in TROM you are knocking out TIME. You are NHOT addressing the incident. In Dianetics the approach is to move to the incident and then run through it. In TROM you paste the past into NOW or (PT) present time.

Yes, that is correct. It was just due to habitual thinking that I used running out.

I would advise that you FIRST ensure you are in PT. --- You know! Be aware of your body sitting on the chair - your feet on the floor - feel the desk - and then check your head is where it should be. etc ;-)

Then - when in PT - pick up a something from the past and paste it into PT. If you can't bring the whole into PT - take a smaller part of it.



I often start thinking of some past conflicting postulate (CP). Then check PT and when I go to look at the CP - I find I am chuckling or laughing at it.

What is the Direct reception method?


First: Was is not you who provided me with the link when I requested on IVy when I lost the link when my old computer fried a couple of months ago?

Second: If not and you don't know, you can read the website. So why do you ask when it is right there a click away, in front of you?






I clearly explained that I provided it as an example of clear language writing.

It could also serve for some people as something to evaluate and compare to better understand TROM. That is method for understanding.



It's solo tech  is similar to TROM L2  and L3  but without TBing.

It is resource material for better understanding.

It explains in very clear language how to look for stuff to process.

It helped me better understand Dennis'  cryptic writing.

Regards,


David



Regards,

Martin



At  2/08/2010 Monday 00:07, David wrote:
*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************




I think I cogged on what repair of importances means or should mean. What RI means is one of the mysteries of TROM for many. RI s is one of the first brain fucks.


This is what I think it means.

Suppose you ran out incidents that had the condition or postulate ( program ) of:

I am stupid.


The RI  would be  ( might be ) ( the ideal replacement postulate )  :


I am very mentally sharp and intelligent.


If you ran out :

I am ugly.

The RI  would be:


I am beautiful.


If you ran out:


I am dishonest.

The RI  would be:

I always operate with full  honesty and integrity.

( If necessary define honesty and integrity for yourself by looking it up in a dictionary. )




Etc.  etc. .

Doing RI s means mentally placing these new desired postulates in a spherical space around you.





To those who claim to understand  TROM ,     am I  correct?

If not ,  please correct me.




Now on to resolving the next riddle or mystery.


This one has taken me over a year to resolve.

TROM , in the way it is written , is not a bona fide clearing process.

Bona fide means without fraud or deceit.

It may contain a good clearing process, but is not a good clearing process, it is cleverly hidden in amongst various lies and traps and mysteries.

Those who say it is clearly written are intellectually and perceptually dishonest.


Something clearly written means that the subject can be clearly understood in at most three or four reads.


The energy that even comes off the TROM words tends to fog and numb the mind.

In contrast to the Direct Perception Method process which gives a clear and refreshing feeling like a breath of fresh air.



David








On 1-Aug-10, at 5:05 PM, Martin Foster wrote:

*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
Some more info Mike:

PROFESSIONAL AUDITOR'S BULLETIN



                                   >From L. RON HUBBARD

                          Via Hubbard Communications Office

                        163 Holland Park Avenue, London W.11

                                     18 February 1955

                                      STRAIGHT WIRE
excerpt:
The entire text of Self Analysis, in its original edition now available

from the Foundation in Phoenix, is devoted to rehashing the preclear's past to

show him that it is not quite as dangerous as it is made out to be, and that

it won't bite him if he remembers some things about it.

From this form of Straight Wire we go into a more complicated form as

given in Self Analysis in Scientology, a converted edition of the original

Self Analysis. The edition is converted, by the way, simply by substituting

everywhere in its text for the word "recall" the word "mock up." Simply by

substituting "mock up" in the directions at the beginning of each list, one

has a modern Self Analysis.
At  1/08/2010 Sunday 22:02, [email protected] wrote:
Hi maybe you guys can shed a little light on this subject. The self Analysis book as well as many other self help books I have seen have long lists that start as "Recall as time when" and then proceeds to state a happy or pleasurable event in your past. What is the actual effect of sitting a doing these lists? Just to get you to remember happy times or does it have a more permanent (rewiring) of the brain which actually makes one happier by constantly remembering happy moments for the past? Thanks you for your insights!!



The book, I think, gives the answer to your question - but here's mine anyway.

The more theta you have - the easier you are able to confront and handle the reactive mind. Running pleasure moments increases your theta level and therefore increases ability and confront.

You could also try "mocking up" pleasure moments. I read somewhere that the first SA book used "mock up" processing and that due to copyright issues the "recall" SA was then published.

Mocking up aligns with TROM'S Repair of Importances. (RI) - My personal view is that RI is more effective if "Importances" are used in the process and not just objects.

Martin

_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.851 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3043 - Release Date: 08/01/10 08:34:00

_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to