DAVEH:  My latest reply is in GREEN........

Terry Clifton wrote:

DAVEH:  Do you suppose the 'salvation' Jesus referred to coming to Zacchaeus' house (Lk 19:9)  might refer to the author of salvation (Jesus) abiding at his house (Lk 19:5)?  > the cross, both of which would seem to punch holes in your argument,

tc:No

DAVEH:  You are reading into Scripture what is not there, Terry.  What makes you think the thief was saved?  While no claim of salvation is made by Scripture, many folks make that mistaken assumption based on the comment that Jesus made that he (Jesus) would see him (the thief) in paradise. .

    The reason we know the thief did not go directly to heaven is
because Jesus told him........

"........Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in
paradise."  (Lk 23:43)

..........Now, where did Jesus go that day (which was Friday)?  We know
it was not heaven, because 2 days later he said to
Mary........

"......Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father:......"  (Jn
20:17)

.......So Terry, since Jesus had not yet returned to his Father until
Sunday (after he met Mary), then it follows that he spent the
previous day or so NOT in heaven.  That brings up the question of where
was he?  I have quoted this verse before, but will do so
again.......

"For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust,
that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh,
but quickened by the Spirit:  By which also he went and preached unto
the spirits in prison; Which sometime were disobedient, when
once the long-suffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark
was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved
by water."  (1Pet 3:18-20)

.......And, what was he doing there?........

"For for this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead,
that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but
live according to God in the spirit."  (1Pet 4:6)

........So, it seems reasonable to conclude that paradise is not in
heaven, but a part (with spirit prison) of the spirit world where
Jesus taught the gospel to those who had not yet heard it.  This gives
evidence of several things.....

1.  Spirits exist after death and prior to being resurrected.

2.  The gospel can be taught to those who have previously died.

3.  Those spirits have free agency to accept the gospel.

4.  The reason the gospel is taught in the spirit world, is that the
spirits who have not had the opportunity to hear the gospel while
alive would hear it in the spirit world so that they could be judged as
though they were still in the flesh, but return to heaven.

5.  The spirit world is comprised of a paradise and a spirit prison.

6.  And finally, the thief was not necessarily "saved" merely because Jesus said he would meet him in paradise.

> with no mention of even a drop of water.

DAVEH:  Perhaps he was one of those who were baptized for the dead as mentioned by Paul in 1Cor 15:29!   :-)

+++++++++++

.........So Terry, do you agree with my above explanation of why you misunderstand the perceived salvation of the thief?
  No.  I believe that you are appointed once to die, and then the judgment.  If you are not saved when you draw your last breath, you will open your eyes in hell the next moment,
DAVEH:  I respectfully disagree.  The Bible (and real life/death experiences) plainly show this is not the case.  IMHO, the judgment follows death by some time.
just as the rich man did who refused to be charitable to Lazarus. Your ability to use words not withstanding, your beliefs are founded on faulty logic and weird assumptions too numerous to even contemplate.
DAVEH:  In other words......you are not able to refute my above Biblical explanation?!?!?!?!
 I fear that you are one of those nice guys who will spend eternity in torment. I fear that because I see you as a false teacher. Terry
DAVEH:  OK Terry, I understand you feel that way, as do many other TTers.  However, I've been accused of a lot worse in this Forum!  I do find it interesting that some have accused me of introducing Mormon Scripture to contradict the Word of God.  As you can see from my above analysis, Terry, I have not used anything other than that which is given to all men through the Bible.

I'll admit that I am not perfect and make erroneous conclusions sometimes.  But I'm interested in knowing how I made an error in my above conclusion about paradise based on what the Bible says.  You have apparently been taught common beliefs that have been passed down through traditional Christianity for hundreds of years.  Does that make it right?  With all the divergent doctrines espoused amongst the Protestant churches, it is obvious that they can't all be correct about everything.    If you think my understanding of the Bible is logically incorrect, please show me.  Otherwise, I can only conclude that your presumed understanding of the Bible (at least the above mentioned passages) is illogical and incorrect.

Terry......all I've done is read the Bible with a critical eye and put two and two together to come up with the correct answer.  By assuming a particular doctrine has to be correct, and then ignoring what the Bible says about it leads to incorrect conclusions.....which I believe you have done in this instance.

Now Terry.......as for me being a "false teacher", I have only explained to you what the Bible teaches.  You can ignore me, if you wish......but I would sincerely hope you would not ignore the Bible.  IF you do, you too might be "one of those nice guys who will spend eternity in torment" with me!!!   <VBG>


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain Five email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
 

Reply via email to