Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Blaine, I was referring specifically to DavidH who claims that ChristiansDAVEH: That's not quite correct, Perry. Most TTers have steered clear of discussing the T-Doctrine with me. Though I've been asking for a number of years now, there has only been one Christian (DavidM) who has really made an effort to explain it, and I found his explanation to be a little less than what I am seeking. For instance, I never was able to get a plausible answer as to what the term substance means relative to the T-Doctrine. DavidM used the example of water vapor, liquid water and ice, but I'm ot sure that entirely describes the nature of God. I even tried to take your advice about looking it up in a Bible dictionary, Perry....couldn't find it there either. (THE NEW SMITH'S BIBLE DICTIONARY)
have tried to explain the Trinity to him for 3-4 yeears now, and that he
still does not understand it.
Would you like to pursue a discussion about the T-Doctrine, Perry???
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain Five email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
