On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:00:29 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I am not speaking of your plagiarism. I really care less about it...
 
jt: Then why do you continue to feed comments like Gary's and help to keep the issue alive?  You know, like "he who is without sin?"
 
unless you were jabbing pin and needles into others for plagiarism. Sometimes the words of another human being expresses our thoughts better than we can. I also don't care about "cuss words" unless it's overdone. These are not holiness issues to me.
 
jt: So it does not bother you if sweet and bitter water come from the same fountain?
 
I am extremely concerned over hypocrisy. I fear it in my own life and I yearn for people to express their concerns regarding the hypocrisy they smell in MY life. This trait manifested in the last week, and you have NOT repented of it.
 
jt: Excuse me?  I have publicly repented/apologized to people on this list and I have dealt with my own heart before the Lord. Do you need something special Slade? I'm sorry that this does not measure up to your standard. Will you forgive me?
 
In fact, you hide behind weak screens like "Dake is not a theologian" and "Dake was a spirit filled man which I believe gives one more insight into certain truths" which makes it all right for YOU to quote him, but quotes of other men are worthless, incessant wadings.
 
jt: The late Finis Dake was not a theologian and what I quoted was truth no matter where it came from. But Truth appears only a minor issue here some seem to be much more interested in nit picking.
 
All you have to do is go back through those archives and see how many times you say something like "all I need is Scripture." What's worse, is you criticize the Pharisees for being hypocrites!!!
 
jt: What I meant to convey is that if we are going to major on talking about truth we would be better off to stay with Scripture; as for the Pharisees, Jesus called them hypocrites so I am in agreement with the Master. They put loads on other people that they weren't willing to carry themselves and I'm beginning to wonder if there isn't some of the Pharisee spirit here right now.
 
Apparently, the fruit doesn't fall far from the tree.
 
jt: The Pharisee tree?
 
THIS is the issue of greatest concern. It's not a case of rubbing it in.
 
jt: Then why do you keep doing so and delving into all the details again when you do it?
 
It's a case of wishing you the best in your life. Hypocrisy will destroy you unless you give it to God. -- slade
 
jt: What does God want with it Slade?  My you have a back handed way of wishing me the best in life - Like nothing I say makes a dent in whatever you have already concluded concerning me.  But Oh well, all I can say is that I am so glad God does not hold grudges.
 
P.S. I asked a question about the two messages that went astray Slade - up front and out in the open, giving you the opportunity to respond in kind...


 
jt: Others can do whatever they like Slade. I just got weary of being confronted with the doctrines
of certain men over and over, and over, and over on TT.  Also I don't use my Dake's Bible in any closet,
it's right out there on the table with the others and I've made no secret of the fact that that I have one.
BTW since I have publicly repented for this why is it not dropped?  Is God in favor of beating ppl
over the same offence 70 times 7?  The thread should be defunct and yet you the Moderator go on to
feed Gary's insult as follows:
 
myth (e.g., reflectg on her exchngs, even with you: her posts indicate her monolithic presumption
of theolgicl superiority)
 
jt: AD-HOMINEM
 
Within the context of this thread, I disagree.
 
-- slade
 
jt: The mind boggles; in light of the above gets by then what left to moderate?? 
PS: The reason I am responding publicly is because you initially posted this publicly which David has
asked us not to do.
 
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 19:15:00 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In that case, Izzy, what do you call it? She criticized others for reading the words of "sages" and here she was doing likewise in the closet... and got caught. If this is not hypocrisy, then you need to give me a definition.
 
-- slade
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Monday, 27 December, 2004 15.16
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judy's Plagiarism

 

What upsets me much more than the fact that you plagiarized -- something we have probably all done at one time or another -- is the hypocrisy, the deceit, the dishonesty of it all. I hope,

 

Bill, this is NOT something of which one should accuse a Believer, as Believers do NOT do these things (hypocrisy, the deceit, the dishonesty).  Izzy


      
 

  
 

Reply via email to