Re: [TruthTalk] Traditional Christian theology -- does sham mean anything

[Knpraise]

In a message dated 1/18/2005 5:10:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

                                                                                                                               

It is my opinion - that this moderation thing is getting too oppressive.  When it becomes impossible to dialogue with another person without
constant nit picking about ad hominems then communicating becomes more of a burden than a joy..  Is it really necessary?  There was no question about ad hominem when G accused me of writing on an 8th grade level. which is both personal and unflattering along with the ongoing cult and myth accusations...Is my referring to Lance's incarnation doctrine one time worse than all that?  Hey! I can overlook some things - in fact I would rather overlook things myself than live with this constant scrutiny.  Could we save it for crisis situations?

How about just discussing the validity of the teaching in question?   You can't do that without insulting the person or the teaching itself? I count only four contributors on this forum who apprently can't comply.  4 out of 14 contributors  --   obviously it can be done.
And you don't overlook anything considered negative.    Nothing. 
John