That explains it, Lance is from Canuckastan
Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I only retired once Lance but reconsidered - How could I deprive G of the joy of holding my feet to the fire?As for being a fan of his, all I can say is - you must enjoy certain types of poetry. The meanings I postedcome from Websters New World Dictionary; are you sure you are using them correctly? Or maybe Canadahas their own dictionaries - I know Australia does. jtOn Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:34:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:The rest of the 'triad' may denounce me but I ACTUALLY AM HAPPY TO BE PRESENT AT YOUR THIRD (?) COMING.The 'G' man isn't for everyone. I'm a fan while you may prefer the 'fundy' triad (David, Linda, Judy).PS-check your definitions for synonymous meanings.From: Judy TaylorHold up Lance!
This is Judy now only semi retired :) I know you are glad to see my return :)[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TO DAVID MILLER:If you wish to understand 'spiritual discernment' then, read this post by 'the 'G' man'. The majority of his posts warrant serious consideration.jt: What in the world for? Most of the time his msgs are almost totally unintelligible. Ppl who desire both communication and community are willing to use great plainness of speech.Have you noticed, David, the coterie of contributors countermanding the cacophony of 'thin' voices?jt: Coterie/cacophony? 1. Organization of land held by peasants - 2. harsh sounding, bad, evil voice? I don't think so.Does this kind of talk not belie your "community concept Lance?"I've wondered about the synchronization between yourself and Izzy. I believe it to be a political and religious connection stemming from your biblicist and fundamentalist approaches. Such a 'foundation' is delimiting.jt: What if it were in reality a "spiritual connection"? Politics and religion is in your ballpark. Constantine and his famous edict, church fathers, orthodoxy and all that.The 'voice of God' is present on TT, David. Were you to assume a listening posture over one of pontificating (through your quotes & questions) you might well thank God for it. IMOjt: Sure am glad to see the qualifier at the end... jtFrom: Terry Clifton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
myth (revisionist; jt could not teach 'the WoG' to anyone today apart from specific 20th c. representations she isparaged..this comment cloaks your own view of the WoG that it equates to the 16th-19th c. biblical lit and interpetation, in which, mainly current cult and political factions remain steepd)On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:54:01 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Judy..stood up for the Word of God...attempted to help others reconcile their teachings with the Word of God.
=================================================
If either Judy or Slade stays gone I will miss them. I learned from them both. Hopefully, they will reconsider.
Terry
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

