John wrote:
>What if I think "pearls before swine" more aptly
>applies to the Miller Four. Is that allowed.
Now you are getting too specific about specific members. You can get away
with referring to "hardened Protestants" or "hardened Bible Thumpers" or
maybe even "hardened fundamentalists" with an implication toward such
individuals. However, expect to be challenged on your interpretation if you
were to make such assertions.
But what if I believe that the Miller Four (whoever that really is) is an alliance of hardened legalist? What then. It only works if it is hardened Mormons. As long as I refrain from specific names, I am clear. I love legalist. They always flame out in their attempt at fashoning laws that benefit themselves and exclude others. Here, I speak of "legalist" in general and not of a particular legalist.
Jd
