Re: [TruthTalk] vessels meet for masters use

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:23:13 -0800

No comparison between Westcott & Hort who were unbelieving Infidels
and
King James who was a Evangelical Christian

Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last post on the 'Sodomite' King: It's still a good Bible. My point is a contrasting one to your Wescott/Hort point. Venom regularly drips from your incisors with nary a care so...........
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 21, 2005 12:27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] vessels meet for masters use

See 'Queen James'.
 
Ben Johnson "And there must go much more to the make of a guilty man than rumor."
 
Reverend Barrie Williams sums up the desperation "... there must be many besides myself for whom nine short words of the King are sufficient: 'Jesus had His John, and I have my George.' King James was in every estimate a devout protestant, and anyone who can believe that he would cast aspersions on the moral integrity of Our Saviour would have no difficulty in believing that the world is flat."

Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
See 'Queen James'. It's not slander. Also, it's still a useful translation for those trapped in a time warp. (Kevin/Judy)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: February 21, 2005 10:31
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] vessels meet for masters use

 
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:16:40 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No confusion here. He was, as you and Kevin would say, A SODOMITE!!
 
jt: You will need to come up with proof for the above statement or be thought a slanderer Lance.
How can you prove King James 1 was a homosexual for sure and that this is not a rumor?
Did he voluntarily come out of the closet - was he "outed"?  Did he actually take an active part in
doing the translation?
 

> From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > John wrote:
> > >> a gay type  (whom you dispise) is
> > >> on the cover of your inspired version.
> >
> > Kevin wrote:
> > > Where is the proof of your slander?
> >
> > I did some study on this subject some years ago.  It seemed to me
> that the
> > evidence that King James was homosexual was inconclusive.  There
> was a guy
> > named Weldon that made the allegations 25 years after the king's
> death,
> but
> > his writings show extreme bias against the Scottish people in
> general,
> > considering them all to be fornicators and homosexuals.  Some of
> the
> > allegations center around certain letters that were written that
> seemed
> too
> > affectionate.  On the basis of this kind of evidence, it could be
> argued
> > that Jesus was a homosexual because John laid his head on the
> chest of
> > Christ during the last supper.  I personally believe that the
> rumor that
> > King James was a homosexual to be false gossip.
> >
> > One thing we do know is that King James took a keen interest in
> theology.
> > He was well educated in various languages such as French, Latin,
> Greek,
> etc.
> > He was not at all like our modern politicians in regards to
> intellectual
> > ability in theology.  He responded to the suggestion of a new
> version by
> the
> > Puritan John Reynolds because he did not appreciate the
> theological slant
> of
> > the notes in the Geneva Bible.  It seems to me from some of
> John's
> comments
> > that he might be confusing King James I with the earlier King
> Henry VIII.
> >
> > Peace be with you.
> > David Miller.
> >
> >
> > ----------
> > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
> may
> know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
> >
> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email
> to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you
> have a
> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
> may know how you ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you
> have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed...
>
>
 

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

Reply via email to