Kevin wrote Where is the proof of your slander?
KD says When pressed for the "facts" we are met with evasion & refusal.
Reason being is that they are Ashamed to post the juvenile prattle that is the basis for their "tabloid style facts"
Reason being is that they are Ashamed to post the juvenile prattle that is the basis for their "tabloid style facts"
Their libelous Opinion is based on indisputable facts such as "David LOVED Jonathan" and "Jesus LOVED them" so they too were Homosexuals
They refute their case by means of the very passages which lead them to infer it
This is sadly; par for the course, in todays MODERN society. We are witnesses to the decay & decline of modern civilization. Morals and historical ethics begone, our society as a whole is preoccupied with slander scandel & dirt. The muddying of the waters causes many to be unable to discern right from wrong & truth from error! Facts are from a bygone era, today it is the Voyeuristic & the spectacular that Modern people want. To stand idly by while some slander anothers good name, especially one that can not defend themselves is a Shame. Whether it is Jesus, David, or King James we must stand against the bottom dwellers!
King James wrote "And principally exercise true wisdom in discerning wisely between true and false reports. First concerning the nature of the person reporter; next, what effect he can have in the well or evil of him whom of he maketh the report; thirdly, the likelihood of the purpose itself, and the last the nature and past life of the delated person ... "
And:
"They quarrel me (not for any evil or vice in me) but because I was a king, which they thought the highest evil, and because they were ashamed to profess this quarrel they were busy to look narrowly in all my actions, and I warrant you a moat in my eye, yes a false report was matter enough for them to work upon."
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
See 'Queen James'. It's not slander. Also, it's still a useful translation for those trapped in a time warp. (Kevin/Judy)----- Original Message -----From: Judy TaylorSent: February 21, 2005 10:31Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] vessels meet for masters useOn Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:16:40 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No confusion here. He was, as you and Kevin would say, A SODOMITE!!jt: You will need to come up with proof for the above statement or be thought a slanderer Lance.How can you prove King James 1 was a homosexual for sure and that this is not a rumor?
Did he voluntarily come out of the closet - was he "outed"? Did he actually take an active part indoing the translation?
> From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > John wrote:
> > >> a gay type (whom you dispise) is
> > >> on the cover of your inspired version.
> >
> > Kevin wrote:
> > > Where is the proof of your slander?
> >
> > I did some study on this subject some years ago. It seemed to me
> that the
> > evidence that King James was homosexual was inconclusive. There
> was a guy
> > named Weldon that made the allegations 25 years after the king's
> death,
> but
> > his writings show extreme bias against the Scottish people in
> general,
> > considering them all to be fornicators and homosexuals. Some of
> the
> > allegations center around certain letters that were written that
> seemed
> too
> > affectionate. On the basis of this kind of evidence, it could be
> argued
> > that Jesus was a homosexual because John laid his head on the
> chest of
> > Christ during the last supper. I personally believe that the
> rumor that
> > King James was a homosexual to be false gossip.
> >
> > One thing we do know is that King James took a keen interest in
> theology.
> > He was well educated in various languages such as French, Latin,
> Greek,
> etc.
> > He was not at all like our modern politicians in regards to
> intellectual
> > ability in theology. He responded to the suggestion of a new
> version by
> the
> > Puritan John Reynolds because he did not appreciate the
> theological slant
> of
> > the notes in the Geneva Bible. It seems to me from some of
> John's
> comments
> > that he might be confusing King James I with the earlier King
> Henry VIII.
> >
> > Peace be with you.
> > David Miller.
> >
> >
> > ----------
> > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
> may
> know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
> >
> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email
> to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you
> have a
> friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
>
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you
> may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
> http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you
> have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed..
>
>
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
