|
Lance I've got to go out and won't be back until later
today lest you misinterpret my silence.
I find it ironic that you - the one who comes in with
the one liner and then retires until the noise dies down
would make these kinds of demands. You who
normally speak in obscure unintelligible sentences (to those who don't spend all
of their times watching movies that is). jt
Jt's 'slip slidin' away' once again. When your
asked ANYTHING with some specificity, you just turn the tables thus,
critiquing the one who asks you a genuine question.
Will you:
1. Demonstrate my meaning?
2. Address the issue therein?
Please put up or......
When you, David, Kevin et al SELECT TEXTS which
you deem appropriate for any issue under discussion, you are interpreting,
teaching, imagining..God's own answers to that which is being spoken of. I
do not believe that you've ever 'seen' that, nor do I believe that you ever
will 'see' that. IMO it's not complicated.
jt: You don't have to "believe
me" Lance since I'm not looking for followers. However, I do think it tragic
that you know so much about movies and lines in movies and so little about
the Word of God which shows me clearly which type of wisdom has your full
attention. Obviously you are not involved with taking thoughts captive
to the obedience of Christ but rather walking in the counsel of the ungodly
and sitting in the seat of the scoffer (with regard to DM anyway)
jt
I don't demonize any part of the body per se
Lance but without spiritual discernment everyone is open to
deception. Look at how the adversary
uses the "imagination" and John Lennon's song is a perfect
example. God does not reveal Himself to
mankind through their fallen imaginations. Nor does He reveal His Word
to us in this way. Faith imagination is a misnomer. How do
you know the Jesus you conjure up is not the "angel of light?"
God will either hide or reveal Himself to whomsoever He wills -
and He hides Himself from the proud but gives grace to the humble.
jt
Jt:'I don't want a Jesus of my own
imagination..'
1. Please don't demonize the imagination.
It comes into play in all of our thinking (theologizing). The kind of
'interpreting' that you, David et al do on a regular
basis.
2. Therefore, like it or not, YOU DO HAVE
A JESUS OF YOUR OWN 'IMAGINING'.
G, you sound just
like my mother who, last time I was with her was in total unbelief
and I have no reason
to believe things have changed since
then. She told me one would have to have a good
imagination to
believe the Bible.
This is the fruit of liberal unbelieving scholars and clergy on the
radio and in her Church
which BTW has lost it's candlestick and is
getting ready to close the doors and auction the building. God
will
not be mocked and ppl always reap what they
sow. I don't want a Jesus of my own imagination who
would
just be another antichrist figure.
judyt
So the ressurection story developed over time from a
legend?
A tall tale?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
'saga' and 'legend' are types of history, the
event/s (or Event/s) of which gives rise to
'stories'
pastors tell ppl stories, in this case the story
of the resurrection
it's like the story of JCs birth--in KJ English
someone writes: ~ 'now the birth of Jesus was on this wise' or
Jesus' birth came about like this...
such stories do not falsify such events (with a
capital 'E'); they let you imagine the truth involved..kinda
like a good (B Dylan:) song
So maybe you could explain ..
these quotes, why is the ressurection a
"Legend"?
||
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new
enhanced search. Learn
more.
|
