On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:32:15 -0600 "Caroline Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Judy:
Terah was 70 years old when he became the father of Abram, Nahor and Haran [Gen 11:28]
 
Hi Caroline,
My first question is how do you know Terah was 70yrs old when Abram was born?  Gen 11:26 tells us that Terah was 70yrs old when he began having children and that he had three sons.  Scripture does not reveal to us which son was born first, the name of Terah's wife, or how old Terah was at the time each of his sons was born.
Terah lived till he was 205 years old and he died in Haran [Gen 11:32]
Abram was 75 years old when he left Haran [Gen 12:4]
Therefore he left while his father was still alive.
 
jt: Caroline truth can not be based upon assumption.  The scriptures do not conflict, nor do they contradict.  If Abram left Haran after his father Terah died at 205yrs of age, then Abram had to have been born when Terah was 130; this would make Abram 75yrs old when he left Haran as per Genesis 12:4.  Your scenario doesn't even make good common sense. Why would Terah's remaining son and grandson leave him alone in Haran for the final (60 by your figures) years of his life?  He would have travelled with them.
 
When Luke wrote that passage in Acts, I'm sure his Jewish buddies, especially Paul who knew the OT inside out, must have pointed out the "error" in Acts 7:4. Luke could have just cut out the phrase "After the death of his father" but I'm guessing God would not let him. I think he must have agonized over that but he had to leave it. The people who later picked Luke's gospel and Acts to be a part of the bible also knew about the "error" but they chose these two works anyway. They agreed Luke's writings were inspired. As a matter of fact, Luke has a great reputation among secular historians as an accurate and meticulous recorder of history, which is why I think it mortified him that he was not allowed to change that little itsy bitsy bit in Acts 7.
 
jt: Apparently your faith rests in the works of men more than in the ability of the Creator of the Universe to get it all together Caroline because the above is pure speculation with no basis in fact -  Reality is that. "ALL scripture is given by inspiration of God and is good for doctrine, reproof, correction, and instruction in righteousness" (2 Tim 3:16).  I think we've gotten it a little turned around here. The scriptures are given to correct humankind rather than vice versa.
 
There are several such little hiccups scattered through the bible. None of them are crucial doctrinal stuff though they do cause the reader to go whoa! didn't I just read somewhere else....?!? Now why would God do this? :-) Could it be that He foresaw us trying to replace a relationship with Him with a leather bound, gilt-edged god we can hold in our hands?
 
jt: Yeah right!  Well Jesus Himself seemed to think the "leather bound gilt-edged Word" of paramount importance. He told the religious
leaders he dealt with that they didn't understand what he was saying because they didn't know God or His Word.  I'd say the same goes for those struggling with the "little hiccups" today.  God will not be mocked and He doesn't take it lightly when ppl think they are smarter than Him. He has always been both willing and able to conceal His Words from some and reveal them to others. 
 
I've written answers to your questions in the post below just under your questions. I intend to tackle the other question you asked me which I "answered" by giving you those two passages. I'll do that tonight when I have more time. Hope you're having a pleasant evening, dear Judy.  Love,  Caroline
 
Thanks, Judy
 
jt: Please tell me you are joking Caroline, or does God's Word have no integrity whatsoever in your eyes?
 
Caroline:
God's Word (Jesus) has the love of all my heart, mind and soul. I also love the bible. I read it and study it and like to talk to other people about it.
 
jt: Would I be accurate in saying that you do see God's Word and scripture as one and the same but that you have conferred this title on Jesus in the flesh?
 
jt: Are you following three Gods Caroline?
 
Caroline:
I'm a firm Trinitarian in that I believe in God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. I understand there are Unitarians (which I don't think anyone on TT is) and Oneness Pentecostals who only believe in God the Father.
 
jt: The reason I asked the question is that you referred to them in the plural. 
 
jt: Are you saying that perceived errors in scripture can be checked by someone who speaks to you Caroline?
 
Caroline:
I believe we work out our faith in community and with the Holy Spirit. The most wonderful thing about Christianity is that our God is living and active and we can speak to Him.
 
jt: Is the "community thing" same to you as "working out your own salvation with fear and trembling?" and by the above are you saying that you "speak to Him" through community?
 
 

Reply via email to