Maybe you could buy some really cool stuff from DH with forged money, if he percieves it to be the same as the real McCoy
Since he may percieve it as real $$$$ does that make it so?
Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave, it appears that you conveniently chose the similarities to focus on.
Let me mention a few differences.
1. Is you jesus a procreated being from your god and one of his spirit
wives? Not Mine.
2. Is your jesus the brother of Satan? Not mine.
3. Is the father of your jesus flesh and bones? not mine.
4. Was the father of your jesus once a man? Not mine.
5. Did the father of your jesus have a father? Not mine.
6. Id the father of your jesus from Kolob? not mine.
7. Did the father of your jesus have multiple spirit wives? not mine.
8. Are your jesus, and his father, and the holy spirit 3 gods? Not mine.
9. In the mormon paradigm, does virgin mean "young girl", or "never been
with a man"?
10. Where in the Bible does it say god's genetic material ended up in mary?
Where does it even say god HAS genetic material.
Dave, in my opinion (and evidently in the opinoin of many) they are not the
same. You have said it yourself...all false religions contain some of the
truth...mormonism is no exception.
Perry
>From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Belief
>Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:03:05 -0700
>
>* the onus is on us to prove him to not be the same as our Jesus.*
>
>DAVEH: Perhaps I should have explained myself a bit better, Perry. What
>I was objecting to was your above comment. I don't see where it is
>anybody's job to denigrate, berate or disqualify another's belief about
>Jesus. Regardless what you may think I believe or not believe about
>Jesus....My Jesus is my Savior, just as he is your Savior.
>
> As I see it....you, Kevin, Lance or any other person (Christian or not)
>can explain their belief in Jesus as they perceive him. Then I (or
>anybody else) can agree that I believe the same way, or not. For
>instance....
>
> FWIW....I may be wrong in my assumptions of what you believe about the
>following, but follow along to get a feel for what I am trying to say:
>
>1) I assume you believe Jesus was born of a virgin mother. I believe the
>same.
>
>2) As I understand it, you believe Jesus was conceived by the Holy Ghost.
> I do not. I believe he is literalerally the Son of God, being conceived
>of the genetic (if that is the correct term) material of our Heavenly
>Father by the power of the Holy Ghost.
>
>3) You believe Jesus died on the cross and was resurrected 3 days later.
>I believe the same.
>
> Now, the above is a somewhat simplistic example, but I think it
>illustrates the point. On two of the three points we agree. On one we
>disagree. Does that mean that we believe in two totally different Saviors?
> Not in my opinion.
>
> You are probably asking what this has to do with the original
>discussion. The point I am trying to make is that if you were to single
>out my believe that Jesus is the literal Son of God as evidence that I
>believe in a different Jesus than you do.....well.....you might have to say
>that I believe the Bible too much when I quote a myriad of passages
>supporting my perspective view about Jesus. Does the fact that we might
>have two different perspectives about Jesus' paternal attributes mean that
>we are talking about two different people? If not....then what point is
>there in trying to prove what the person believes is wrong. It doesn't
>change the fact that we are still talking about Jesus who was born of a
>virgin and died on a cross in our behalf.
>
> Now....If you said you believed in the Jesus who died on the cross and
>was resurrected, and I said I believed in the Jesus who sold tacos in
>Mexico.....then it becomes obvious that we are talking about different;
>people. You would not have to prove anything about my Jesus being the
>wrong one. There would be nothing in common between them to tie them
>together.
>
> Yikes....I think I'm rambling on now. I hope I adequately explained
>why I said what I did. If you want clarification, just ask.
>
>
>Charles Perry Locke wrote:
>
>>Dave,
>>
>> Wait a minute! I agree with you and then you tell me I have it
>>backwards? How does that work?
>>
>> You said, "Logically, the onus is not upon me to define the Jesus I
>>believe in, but rather it is on the person who suggests I don't believe in
>>Jesus."
>>
>> I responded, "I think you are right. You are entitled to your jesus,
>>and the onus is on us to prove him to not be the same as our Jesus."
>>
>> And now you say, "You've got that a bit backwards, Perry."
>>
>> Aren't you in essence, then saying that YOU had it a bit backwards
>>since I was agreeing with you?
>>
>>Perry
>>
>>>From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
>>>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
>>>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Belief
>>>Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:25:39 -0700
>>>
>>>DAVEH: You've got that a bit backwards, Perry. The onus is on you to
>>>prove (explain might be a better word) your Jesus.....I don't recall
>>>seeing much of that on TT.....other than he created the world, was born
>>>of a virgin, died and was resurrected.....all of which I believe. Is
>>>there more you (TTers) want to say about your belief about Jesus?
>>>
>>>Charles Perry Locke wrote:
>>>
>>>>Dave,
>>>>
>>>> I think you are right. You are entitled to your jesus, and
>>>
>
>>>>** I feel we have done that. Repeatedly. But, you do not accept our
>>>>evidence, and I suppose short of having a vision, you never will.
>>>>
>>>> You have not said our Jesus is a false jesus because, since you say
>>>>you beleive in the same Jesus we believe in, that would be like shooting
>>>>yourself in the foot.
>>>>
>>>>Perry
>>>>
>>>>>From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
>>>>>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
>>>>>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Belief
>>>>>Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:55:30 -0700
>>>>>
>>>>>DAVEH: Logically, the onus is not upon me to define the Jesus I
>>>>>believe in, but rather it is on the person who suggests I don't believe
>>>>>in Jesus. FTR....I have not said that the Jesus Kevin, you Perry or
>>>>>any other TTer believes in is a false Jesus..
>>>>>
>>>>>Lance Muir wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>DaveH says "Kevin, I believe in Jesus." IFF we are going to engage in
>>>>>>a conversation that entails reality, then we have to continue to build
>>>>>>upon that which has been said previously.According to you THE JESUS TO
>>>>>>BE BELIEVED IN IS MOST FULLY AND ACCURATELY DESCRIBED WITHIN MORMON
>>>>>>TEACHING. Is this so? The Jesus believed in by Kevin, Perry, Lance et
>>>>>>al is a false Jesus. Is this not also so? (unwieldy but, you get my
>>>>>>point)What, IYO, are the eternal consequenses for non-Mormons? Mr.
>>>>>>Moderator:Please grant DaveH the opportunity of fully answering and,
>>>>>>explaining.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DAVEH: FTR Kevin, I believe in Jesus. Therefore can we
>>>>>>conclude
>>>>>> that you've made the judgment rather than God?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Dave Hansen
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.langlitz.com
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>If you wish to receive
>things I find interesting,
>I maintain six email lists...
>JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
>STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
>
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
