Hey DaveH, I'll be a taker -- if you will give me some time to work it into my already-in-progress response to you concerning salvation. In the meantime, if you like you can work something up from your side.
 
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apologetic for the eternal sonship of Christ

DAVEH:   If you will remember, Lance....I tried to start a thread where we could compare how we (LDS) perceive Jesus with how other TTers understand him.  All I got was some criticism for starting such by showing 2 instances where we probably agree.  Instead of continuing the thread by contributing more attributes as other see Jesus...the thread withered for lack of interest.

    If anybody wants to continue it, I would be more than happy to compare what I believe to what any of you believe, and then we can ponder whether the differences are pertinent to our salvation.  Any takers?

Lance Muir wrote:
IMO both Kevin and Perry's motivation is that of a genuine concern for those who do not apprehend Jesus as He is. To note the difference in style is simply to note the difference in makeup of each of the TT participants.
 
The Jesus you articulate is not even a 'distant cousin' to the Jesus they articulate. Thankfully, God looks on the heart. You may be among those who have broken the 'articulation boundary'. He alone knows.
 
Surely gentlemen you've not failed to note the dissimilarity between your Jesus'?
 
Were you to be given the assignment of writing but a few paragraphs outlining that difference, could you do so? Will you do so?
 
looking forward to it,
 
Lance  

-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Dave Hansen
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.langlitz.com
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 If you wish to receive
 things I find interesting,
 I maintain six email lists...
 JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
 STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.

Reply via email to