JD - why are you constantly accusing DavidM of pride
and ATST criticising his definition of sin?
From what I can see he appears to be very diligent with
himself and his family - so how do you reach
this consensus which appears to be agreed upon
by Gary and Lance also?
You describe this pride as a source for sin events - where do you get this
definition? Actually putting up
with sin and doing nothing about it is pride as
Paul so clearly expounds to the church at Corinth (1 Cor 5:3)
It sounds to me like you ppl have things a bit
skewed. Need to do some more homework and repent to
DavidM who is a godly man. jt
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 01:38:44 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks - and we are back to ground zero. My understanding of your theology is right on,near as I can see. Shall we move on, now. You only believe in "event sin." That is just whatyou described. You possess pride (we already knew this) but it is only a source for sin (events)in your life. As long as it lays there, dormant as it were, you remain sinless. JD
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John wrote: > Is it sin or temptation, David? I do not allow > for pride to continue -- it resides in my flesh. > Need I say more -- need I quote more??? Yes, you do need to say more. I don't understand your problem with what I wrote. Pride exists as a temptation of the flesh. When it is yielded to and has conceived, it brings forth the sin of pride. Don't you understand these things? Romans 7. James 1:14-15. Peace be with you. David Miller. ---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
