|
Actually 'I' do know the heart of JD. He is my
brother.
You call him your brother because you are both
enamoured of the same theologians and your hearts are filled
with their teachings; this is what you
have in common.
If you don't, after all of this time then perhaps
you are not his sister.
My brothers and sisters are those who choose
to gather around God's Word with
me.
You do appear to have a rather convoluted
understanding of 'All' truth.
Because it is different from yours
Lance????
Oophs!!
Other than the 'heart' of JD
.... and I meant to also point
out that you don't "KNOW" the heart of JD. Not even JD
himself knows the heart of JD
(Jer 17:9); only God sees the heart
of JD and what it is full of will determine where JD spends
eternity when he either
stands or falls before Him at the last day. jt
Again , you make comment that has little
to do with what I have written. At least you are
consistent.
You really like the sound of the "narrow road" thingy, don'e
you? I prefer the part that says there are so many, they
cannot be counted.
JD
From: Judy Taylor < jandgtaylor1@juno.com> To:
[email protected]Cc: [email protected]Sent:
Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:45:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mythology and
the "list"
So?
We may be at different places in our pilgrimage
but are basically travelling the
same road which is the
narrow path with he strait gate. Whereas
others on TT appear to be breathing
rarified air and on the
broad road ... jt
I have a definition and fully understand what "judgmentalism" is. Nothing double
tongued about it. Give me your definition and I'll
share mine. The clear reason why you Wingers refuse
to present a list of doctrines upon which we must all
agree has to do with the impossibility of the matter
-- your list, Deegan's list, Judy's list or DM's list would not be the
same !!! So you all pretend to agree with each other while
refusing, at the same time, to offer specifics as to this mythological
list. You judge others to hell but refuse to be accountable. &n bsp;
Ditto on this definition for judgmentalism. You all cannot give a
definition that does not find yourselves at fault.
But I already knew this.
JD -----Original
Message----- From: ShieldsFamily
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[email protected]Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:56:19
-0500 Subject: RE: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay
community for homosecuality
How can you be so double-tongued, JD?
You accuse me of that all the time!!! iz
I believe it is spelled "judgmentalism," Bub, and why bring up the
word anyway - no one on the right has a clue as to its
definition. Hard to accuse someone of it when you don't know
what it is.
JD -----Original
Message----- From: Kevin Deegan < openairmission@yahoo.com> To:
[email protected]Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:29:17
-0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay
community for homosexuality
And your Judgemental too!
Is your Brand of HATE speech and JUDGEMENTALISM allowed in
the People's Republique of
CANUCKastan?
Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin: Y'all confuse HONESTY with HATEFULNESS. Y'all don't SPEAK,
Kevin, y'all SPEW!
JD has recognized this
'bout y'all since
I bin on TT.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: September 29, 2005
15:51
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Stop being so HATEfull Lance. Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He did indeed 'hit sin on the
head', Judy. Mostly however, he hit it on the head with those in the 'churches'
of His day. That ring any bells with any of you out there?
(Judy, Kevin, Iz) At whom/with whom do we see His
anger most expressed? At whom/with whom do we see the opposite?
Why look, it's the very ones y'all choose to hate,
demonstrate against etc. Hmmmmmmmmmm strange hugh? Do we all read
the sa me Bible?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: September 29, 2005
07:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
an argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Why arn't
you talking about the "gay issue?" We are supposed to
minister the way Jesus did as He is our example
and He always hit sin head on ie He confronted the rich young
ruler with his heart of covetousness which he was not
yet willing to part with. Jesus didn't
chase
after him and keep talking about grace. He did minister
to those God showed
Him and warned them to go and sin no more lest a
worse
thing come upon them. But He didn't minister to everyone
he met.
Today we take sin so lightly because we don't
believe God means what He says or that the chaos in our lives
is rooted
in sin and unrighteousness. God is supposed to bless this mess because of grace, because he loves
us so much and this
is the lie. He will not do it
because to
do so He would have to violate His own Word. You can
talk grace till the cows
come home but until this person hears the truth
and is willing to repent from the heart God will not
honor your words JD.
Well, maybe
God has put us together "for such a time as
this." Right now
the relationship is something of a novelty
-- at least for him. My
conversation with him is different from "the
others." So, maybe I might be able to make
sense to him. What I am not doing is
talking about the gay issue, per se. He is but I am trying
to get him to stop and examine what it means when it
says that "Christ died for us while we were YET
sinners." My concern is that he
understand the gospel of grace and , and, and, what
it really mean s to be "saved." The new
birth will produce - given
time ............... so that is where I
begin -----------&n bsp; with the new birth.
JD ====================================
I wish you well.
Terry
|
