|
Re:'because it is different from mine'? No. FWIW I
believe that your heart is God's while many of your 'words' are not. That's
really all I and many others have consistently said concerning you. You, on the
other hand have said the same concerning those who have so spoken of/to you.
Time has shown that you are locked into the way you speak so......this is a go
nowhere thingy is it not, Judy?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: October 02, 2005 06:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mythology and
the "list"
Actually 'I' do know the heart of JD. He is my
brother.
You call him your brother because you are
both enamoured of the same theologians and your hearts are
filled
with their teachings; this is what you
have in common.
If you don't, after all of this time then
perhaps you are not his sister.
My brothers and sisters are those who choose
to gather around God's Word with
me.
You do appear to have a rather convoluted
understanding of 'All' truth.
Because it is different from yours
Lance????
Oophs!!
Other than the 'heart' of JD
.... and I meant to also point
out that you don't "KNOW" the heart of JD. Not even JD
himself knows the heart of JD
(Jer 17:9); only God sees the heart
of JD and what it is full of will determine where JD spends
eternity when he either
stands or falls before Him at
the last
day. jt
Again , you make comment that has little
to do with what I have written. At least you are
consistent.
You really like the sound of the "narrow road" thingy, don'e
you? I prefer the part that says there are so many, they
cannot be counted.
JD
From: Judy Taylor < jandgtaylor1@juno.com> To:
[email protected]Cc: [email protected]Sent:
Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:45:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mythology
and the "list"
So?
We may be at different places in our
pilgrimage but are basically travelling the same road which is the
narrow path with he strait gate.
Whereas others on TT appear to be
breathing rarified air and on
the
broad road ... jt
I have a definition and fully understand what "judgmentalism" is. Nothing double
tongued about it. Give me your definition and I'll
share mine. The clear reason why you Wingers refuse
to present a list of doctrines upon which we must all
agree has to do with the impossibility of the matter
-- your list, Deegan's list, Judy's list or DM's list would not
be the same !!! So you all pretend to agree with each
other while refusing, at the same time, to offer specifics as to
this mythological list. You judge others to
hell but refuse to be
accountable. &n bsp; Ditto on this definition for
judgmentalism. You
all cannot give a definition that does not find yourselves at
fault.
But I already knew this.
JD -----Original
Message----- From: ShieldsFamily
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[email protected]Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:56:19
-0500 Subject: RE: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay
community for homosecuality
How can you be so double-tongued, JD? You accuse me of that all the
time!!! iz
I believe it is spelled "judgmentalism," Bub, and why bring up
the word anyway - no one on the right has a clue as to
its definition. Hard to accuse someone of it when you don't know
what it is.
JD -----Original
Message----- From: Kevin Deegan < openairmission@yahoo.com> To:
[email protected]Sent: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:29:17
-0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an argument from the gay
community for homosexuality
And your Judgemental too!
Is your Brand of HATE speech and JUDGEMENTALISM allowed
in the People's Republique
of CANUCKastan?
Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin: Y'all confuse HONESTY with HATEFULNESS. Y'all don't SPEAK,
Kevin, y'all
SPEW! JD has
recognized this 'bout y'all since I bin on TT.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: September 29, 2005
15:51
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] an
argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Stop being so HATEfull Lance. Lance
Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
He did indeed 'hit sin on the
head', Judy. Mostly however, he hit it on the head with
those in
the 'churches' of His day. That ring any bells with any of you
out there? (Judy, Kevin, Iz) At whom/with whom do we see His
anger most expressed? At whom/with whom do we see the
opposite? Why look, it's the very ones y'all choose to hate,
demonstrate against etc. Hmmmmmmmmmm strange hugh? Do we all
read the sa me Bible?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: September 29,
2005 07:52
Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] an argument from the gay community for homosecuality
Why arn't you talking about the "gay
issue?" We are supposed to minister the way Jesus did
as He is our example
and He always hit sin head on ie He confronted the rich young
ruler with his heart of covetousness which he was not
yet willing to part with. Jesus didn't
chase
after him and keep talking about grace. He did
minister to those God showed
Him and warned them to go and sin no more lest a
worse
thing come upon them. But He didn't minister to
everyone he met.
Today we take sin so lightly because we don't
believe God means what He says or that the chaos in our
lives is rooted
in sin and unrighteousness. God is supposed to bless this mess because of grace, because he loves
us so much and this
is the lie. He will not do it
because
to do so He would have to violate His own Word. You
can talk grace till the cows
come home but until this person hears the truth
and is willing to repent from the heart God will not
honor your words JD.
Well,
maybe God has put us together "for such a time as
this." Right now
the relationship is something of a
novelty -- at least for
him. My conversation with him is different
from "the others." So, maybe I might be
able to make sense to him. What I am
not doing is talking about the gay issue, per se. He is
but I am trying to get him to stop and examine what
it means when it says that "Christ died for us while we
were YET sinners." My concern is that
he understand the gospel of grace and , and, and,
what it really mean s to be "saved."
The new birth will produce - given
time ............... so that is where
I begin -----------&n bsp; with the new birth.
JD ====================================
I wish you well.
Terry
|
