Comon, Dave. Kevin has posted reference upon reference of your own prophets and leaders stating that the sex between God and Mary was physical. When presented to you you say something evasive like, "it's a mormon thang...you would not understand." Wake up and smell the postum. Who is in denial? Who refuses to understand what their own leaders have said?

From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:29:25 -0700

DAVEH: I have a slightly different perspective on this, Dean. I view the situation in TT as having a few members believing they have all the truth, and the whole truth, and they endeavor to dispense it as they feel it is needed....whether others feel they need it or not. The problem is that sometimes what they purport is not the truth. That is evidenced by some of the disagreements of TTers, in which it is highly unlikely that two holding diametrically opposed beliefs can both be right.

Now I've seen some mention names of those who are trustworthy in regard to the truth. Dean, your name is one that was recently mentioned as being a pretty trustworthy guy. However, I sometimes see things in your posts that are not true, yet other TTers assume they are true....simply because you and others have repeated the same lies over and over. So.....I don't have that same comfortable feeling in placing my trust in what you say as others have.

   An example of this is your below comment.......

*Their Jesus is only God of this world because he Believed upon a God whom had sex with Mary.*

..........which is not true. Not only do I not believe that, I have so stated such on numerous occasions. And of all the LDS folks I know, none believe such. Yet several TTers continue to make that accusation. So I am amazed that you/they do not quite understand why I don't take their other comments seriously. I'm sure you sometimes preach truth, Dean....but mixing obvious lies with it does you no favors as I see it.

For you to warn TTers from getting confused by anything I say.....seems to me that the blind are leading the blind, so to speak. If you really want to exercise *Damage control* Dean, perhaps you should first consider correcting your own errors, lest you deceive them with outright lies. Otherwise, the *Damage *will be to your own credibility.


Dean Moore wrote:

    ----- Original Message -----
    *From:* Terry Clifton <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* 10/16/2005 10:00:04 PM
    *Subject:* Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter

    I know that some of what Dave believes has no basis in the Holy
    Bible.  That can very likely be said to some extent about each of
    us.  Traditions die hard.  No one seems willing to admit that
grandpa was an idiot for believing some of the things he did. Instead, we follow in grandpa's footsteps until the warning light
    comes on and we check it out in the Word and learn better what to
    believe.  Since Dave is all wet and we are only a little damp, the
    temptation is to write him off.  The problem is, none of us know
    how far God's mercy extends.  If He looks at Dave's heart, or your
    heart, or my heart, and sees selfless love for Him, does that make
    up for buying into false teachings?  If so, how far off base can
    you be and still be acceptable to God?  I do not know, so I also
    must accept Dave as a believer since that is his claim; still, I
    can't help but think that believing that Jesus and Satan were
    brothers is pushi ng it, really testing the mercy of God.



    *cd: see DaveH this is why I come here-to correct this type of
    belief. Damage control.*
    * Terry if I have said anything to help you come to this
    conclusion I apologized for not explaining myself better. Yes one
    can be saved by simply believing upon Christ as the way of
    forgiveness but it must be the Christ of the Bible-A Jesus who has
    been with God from the beginning-a Jesus whom is part of the
    trinity Mormon do not hold this view they have three separate
    Gods.Their Jesus is only God of this world because he Believed
    upon a God whom had sex with Mary.*

    ================================================================
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

     I have highlighted something you said, Terry, that is of great
    importance to me.  DaveH recently spoke of Christ being his
    redeemer and Savior.   I make the same claim.   IN THAT
    DECLARATION, he and I are brothers.   We do not express that
    claim in the same ways  --  but the claim is the same.   And
    JESUS is the Savior, not the church, or the preacher, or the
    prophet of God.    It is before his own Master that he stands or
    falls, and he will be made to stand  !!!!   (Ro 14:4).   Is he or
    other claimants saved?&nbs p;  I don't know.   But I do know that
    Rom ans 14:4 should have something to say in that discussion.   I
    do know, that the words "God works all things for good to them
    who love the Lord  and  ....."  probably includes things that
    have to do with my salvation.   He takes the wrong I do, does not
    bring it into account, and [thus] works a good that benefits me
    eternally.                    Thanks for the words
         Jd


    -----Original Message-----
    From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    To: [email protected]
    Sent: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:34:19 -0500
    Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:The HEART of the matter

    Up to a point, I am in agreement with you, Dave.  When John wrote
    of Jesus, he recorded something very interesting that we find in
    chapter five, about the middle of verse twenty-eight.."the hour
    is coming in which all who are in the graves will hear His voice
    and come forth -- those who _have done good_ to the resurrection
    of life, and those_ who have done_ _evil _to the resurrection of
    condemnation."

     Jesus was stating that He had the authority not only to raise
    the dead, but also to judge them, sending some to Hell and
    inviting others to live eternally with Him.  From other things
    that He said in other scriptures, we know that these are not the
    only things taken into consideration.  You can do all the good
    works you can do, for as long as you can do them, and still go to
    Hell if your faith is not in Christ as your Savior.  Evidently
    one can also claim to be a follower o f Christ but the evil
    pattern of one's life makes a lie o f one's  claim and that
    person is also condemned to Hell.   Those who deny self, follow
    Christ, shun evil and do good get the reward.

    Mother Teresa, it was reported at one time, was not sure of her
    salvation.  How true that is I do not know.  If she did her works
    out of love for her Savior and her fellow man, she most certainly
    will be closer to the throne than me, but if she did these works
    hoping they would save her, she  is begging for a drop of water
    at this moment and will be forever.  I strongly feel that she did
    her works out of love, but like you, I am in no position to
    judge.  We are clearly taught that we are not to judge another's
    works.  Jesus will handle that without our help, and that is a
    good thing.

     I have an opinion about everyone on this list, but I am not
    qualified to say who is saved and who is not.  I do not know your
    heart, or Izzy's , and you do not know mine.  *_We all claim
    Christ as our savior.  All we can do without evidence to the
    contrary is accept one another on the basis of that claim._*  It
    is soooo tempting to say "He or she does not believe as I do,
therefore he or she cannot be saved ." "If they were saved, they would believe as I do", is our pride
    speaking.  We have become modern day Pharisees.  We have it all
    figured out.

    Once we get the beam out of our eye though, we are commanded not
    to throw pearls to swine or a holy sacrifice to the dogs.  If we
    do not make a judgment call, how do we tell the hogs and dogs
    from the Holy?  It is important to know, because if you do what
    you are commanded not to do, they w ill turn and tear you to
    pieces.  It is pretty obvio u s that you should not go into a
    Mosque in Iraq and start preaching Jesus and calling Allah a
    false god.  They would tear the pieces to pieces.  The same thing
    might happen if you preached against looting in the middle of a
    race riot.  But where is the line?  At what point can we say this
    is a hog and this is a dog, and this one needs to hear about
    Christ?  Do we draw the line at holy underwear?  Does smoking
    make you a hog or a dog?  If you think you can sin tonight and do
    penance tomorrow, are you a hog or not?  What if you preach
    salvation without repentance? Are you a holy because you preach,
    or are you a dog because you don't mention repentance?

    It's a good thing God looks at the heart.  Yes sir, a real good
    thing.
    Terry




    Dave Hansen wrote:

    DAVEH:   Sorry about that, Lance.  I had hoped you would
    understand the underlying humor in my answer.

         To give you a serious answer, let me offer the example of
    what I perceive to be true of Mother Theresa.  Neither you or I
    believe that the RCC folks espouse true theology, yet apparently
    MT was a true Christian due to her love of those who were
    disadvantaged.  Is there any truer Christian than one who gives
    her (or his) life to others?  I don't think so.

        There are many Christian folk who believe in doct rines that
    I think are in error.  From my perspectiv e that does not make
    them any less Christian than one how professes true doctrine,
    but yet whose works demonstrate no motivation for being a
    Christian.  There are a lot of goodly (and Godly) sincere
    Christians in the world who believe opposing doctrines.  It is
    not for me to judge them as inadequate in the Lord's eyes.  I'll
    leave the judging to the Judge, and as for myself.....I'll try
    to worry more about how to treat others with respect even though
    I may disagree with their beliefs.

    Lance Muir wrote:

    I'm not asking you to speak for God, Dave. I'm asking for you
    to speak within the context of your own tradition.
You may recall my various attempts to address the question 'Who
    is Jesus?'. Now, whatever the variance within the Christian
    tradition(s) (I do not consider Mormonism Christian), there
    isn't simply a 'variance' between you and I.
         FWIW, I DO BELIEVE that such as Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses
    and Christadelphians MAY be born from above even through a maze
    of heretical beliefs (IMO).

        DAVEH:   How would I know, Lance???   Perhaps Brother Dean
can answer that question from his personal experience! :-D

        Lance Muir wrote:

        Is it possible for one to have a true heart connection (be
        born from above) with God through Christ by the Spirit
        while espousing beliefs via one's dogma that are
        intrinsically unreal (false)?


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.




--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.



----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

Reply via email to