Typo correction: In the last line, "and for us to be opffended" should be
"but not for us to be offended".
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Lance Mur says: I have a sense of DaveH that he ain't
got it in 'em
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:49:58 -0800
Lance, the principle I was taught is that when you offend someone you
apologize...even if you didn't mean to, even if you were joking, even if
you think they are faking offense, apologizing is the right thing to do.
Izzy got it. Kevin got it. Evidently arrogant people don't get it.
While I have railed heavily against Dave's faith, I have not generally
maligned the man. But, having been given this door of opportunity, let me
say how I really feel...
It is not that Dave is a mormon. That is an unfortunate coincidence. It is
that he has behaved arrogantly. It is that has insulted most all on this
forum by arrogantly stating that "he is not here to learn the truth, he is
here to learn what protestants believe". It is that he has said he is here
to learn, but after being told over and over, he fails to learn. It is that
he has said he is not here to teach, then has proselytized us with his
satan inspired faith. It is that he levies his often tasteless humor on
others, but when they have been offended, he has rationalized his behavior,
while belittling the offended. He has taken the words of others and
intentionally twisted them to mean something else, then posted them. When
claims are made about his behavior, his memory is bad, but when he wants to
make claims against others, his memory is restored.
And, it was HE who changed the subject line of the posts in question to
"Izzies Sexual Experiences". He is the one who twisted Dean's call for
moderation, to suggesting that I might know something of Izzies sexual
experiences. HE is the one with the perverse mind. HE is the one who does
not know where to draw the line on his so-called humor. And HIS response is
an arrogant rationalaztion that it is okay for him to say these things, and
for us to be opffended? Back off, Elder Muir!
Perry
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [TruthTalk] Charles Perry Lock says 'A totally arrogant and
insensitive reply, IMO' of Dave Hansen
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:53:48 -0500
I have a sense of DaveH that he ain't got it in 'em but, should anyone's
door need showin' up at ...well...it's pretty obvious to me who they'd be.
He's been spoken to and about with ill intent pretty much daily. As Tom
Snyder used to say of people who behave like you guys have..'go to a
mirror, look into it and, call yourself...(guess)
IMO Perry, you're doing this more because he's a Mormon than because of
what he purportedly meant by what he said.
Iz rather graciously acknowledged her own participation and, requested
that you let this go. Why not do that, Perry?
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
----------
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
