|
JUDY:Am I being unclear? (I often am). Let me take
another run at it.
On those occasions in which you indicate that
you've CORRECTLY APPREHENDED THE MEANING OF GOD'S WORD(s) on given issue, do you
not implicitly or explictly indicate that the one(s) with whom you are speaking
do not?
Would you have genuine difficulty if recalling many
such instances over the last 6 months?
What then, am I attempting to say? YOU DO THAT
WHICH WEARIES AND DISCOURAGES YOU. Thus, on occasion(s) THAT WHICH YOU DO
WEARIES AND DISCOURAGES SOME ON TT IN EXACTLY THE SAME FASHION.
Do you understand?
Do you agree with this assessment?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: December 14, 2005 08:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] TT Double
Standard
No Lance, I wouldn't acknowledge this to be the case
because everything that is spoken on TT is not the
Word of God, and not everything I write is the
Word of God because that would have to include opinion at
times along with personal stories. So what is
the point you are trying to make here? Is it good to be calling one
another hypocrites and disrespecting the
Moderator? Where do you think this kind
of attitude leads??
When you describe that which you say as THE
TRUTH OF THE WORD OF GOD Judy, while that spoken by another as OTHER THAN
the truth of the word of god, Judy then, you are doing the very thing that
you speak of as 'both discouraging and wearying'. Would you not acknowledge
this to be the case?
We should make accusing each other
personally a matter to be discussed offline.
I find these constant accusations to be
both discouraging and wearying - are we interested in Truth or not?
Why give the enemy a platform
to tear each other down.
DAVEH: I don't think you understand the nature of my
posts, Perry. I'm not talking about your sexual
experiences. I'm talking about Christian
hypocrisy and the double standard as practiced on TT. Is
the double standard on TT not a fair topic? Why should I
have to discuss that matter offline? Is this not relevant to
all TTers, Perry?
I find it very telling that
you make false accusations against me.......
you
suggest I might have some knowledge of Izzy's sexual
experiences,
.........which I did not do. Go back and
read my exact words if you don't believe me. If you can't find
them, I'll gladly provide them and you can see for yourself that you are
again accusing me of something I did not do.
you suggest that
saying "one of Joseph Smiths spiritual wives" might have some sexual
connotation,
..........That has been suggested before on TT
by other TTers, and the moderator did nothing to discourage such
comments. Now you want to ban me from posting something other
TTers can post with no retribution. This is simply another example
of a double standard.
you try to spin Dean up by suggesting he
gets "excited" by sexual references.
.........I merely stated
the truth about Deans sensitivity to such things. This was
not an ad-hom attack. Is the truth now a problem on
TT? People have said a lot more vile things about me with no
condemnation by the moderator. Why the double standard now,
Perry?
these amount to false
accusations,
DAVEH: How can that possibly be
a false accusation if it is true, Perry? If
anything, it is you who is making false accusations
about me in this matter. Once again....a TT double
standard.
the intentions of spinning Dean up on a banned
topic
DAVEH: You are absolutely wrong again,
Perry. You simply fail to understand the nature of my posts.
My intentions are not to spin up Dean at all. It is you who
I am trying to enlighten as to the Christian hypocrisy involving the
double standard practiced on TT with regard to Mormons. Until
you as the moderator recognize it, why should I discontinue
pointing it out every time it occurs? Is not the TT double
standard an acceptable discussion topic?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, you suggest I might have some knowledge of Izzy's
sexual experiences, then you suggest that saying "one of Joseph
Smiths spiritual wives" might have some sexual connotation, then
you try to spin Dean up by suggesting he gets "excited" by
sexual references. These amount to false
accusations, with the intentions of spinning Dean up on
a banned topic. Any more posts from you containing sexual
references and I will have to take you off the forum until you agree
not to do so. Take any issues you have up with me, offline, at this
address, not on the forum.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **
Date: Tue,
13 Dec 2005 07:29:32 -0800
* Please try to /refrain
/from making sexual references, especially /false accuastions/.*
DAVEH: Let's see if I understand this,
Perry. Recently I asked some questions that were no more
sexually oriented than what you commonly make, Dean then claimed
foul......and you banned further discussion based on the /perception
/you and Dean had about what those comments might have implied.
Now you have made a comment that can be
perceived to be sexually charged..........
*If lucky, you
may become one of his many spirit wives! *
..........and you
don't want to recognize the double standard? It is interesting
that when you or other TTers make any kind of denigrating remarks
toward LDS theology with sexual implications, nothing is considered
off limits. When I point out this obvious double standard, I
am cautioned by the moderator to /refrain /from bringing the
discussion to the TT table under the guise of making/ false
accusations/. It must be convenient to have a moderator who
can see non-LDS posters through one non-judgmental eye, and perceive
a completely different perspective of LDS posters through the other,
more critical eye. I suppose if one has an ax to grind against
LDS theology, and is not embarrassed to publicly admit such....then
it should not surprise anybody to find that person practicing a
double standard. The curious part about this is that it
happens on a forum called /TruthTalk/, where /truth /is presupposed
to be the dominating factor, yet it seems to be suppressed when it
comes to recognizing the Christian hypocrisy found here.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
* Please try to
/refrain /from making sexual references, especially /false
accuastions/.* This is not the forum for that? I am sure there are
many discussion forums about sex if that type of discussion
interests you.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Perry's Sexually Suggestive Comments
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:07:35 -0800
**If lucky,
you may become one of his many spirit wives! **
DAVEH: I wonder if Dean is going to rebuke
you for making such sexually suggestive comments,
Perry! If not, will we then have another example of
hypocritical Christianity in TT?
Charles Perry Locke
wrote:
Just be sure you remember your
secret password and secret handshake so Joseph Smith will
allow you entrance into heaven. *If lucky, you may become one
of his many spirit wives! *
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Signing off...
Date: Mon,
12 Dec 2005 18:19:35 EST
I guess I never got
to know you, Christine--but hope to meet you in the
great beyond--you may be required to testify at the Bar
of God as to what you
have seen and heard on TT--
Blainerb
In a message dated 12/11/2005 11:24:52
P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I am signing off. I have gotten sucked
into the world of TT, and I think it
would be
beneficial to my GPA to bid adeiu. Thanks for all the
discussions. I
have learned a great deal. May the
Lord bless you and keep you all.
It would be
cool to meet you all in real life some day. But maybe not
all in
the same room. I wonder how that would turn
out... :-)
-Christine Miller
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
|
