Why give the enemy a platform to
tear each other down.
DAVEH: Should TT only be a platform
to tear down Mormons by making suggestive
comments such as.......
*If lucky, you may become one of his many spirit wives! *
.............and then deny the Mormons the right to counter the
comments?
I find these constant accusations to
be both discouraging and wearying - are we interested in Truth or not?
DAVEH: Apparently some are not, Judy. If you find my posts both discouraging and wearying,
may I suggest you simply delete each post I make without reading it.
Judy Taylor wrote:
We should make accusing each other
personally a matter to be discussed offline.
I find these constant
accusations to be both discouraging and wearying - are we interested in
Truth or not?
Why give the enemy a
platform to tear each other down.
DAVEH: I don't think you understand the nature of my posts,
Perry. I'm not talking about your sexual experiences. I'm talking
about Christian hypocrisy and the double
standard as practiced on TT. Is the double standard on TT not a
fair topic? Why should I have to discuss that matter offline? Is
this not relevant to all TTers, Perry?
I find it very telling that you make false accusations
against me.......
you suggest I might have some knowledge of Izzy's sexual
experiences,
.........which I did not do. Go back and read my exact words if you
don't believe me. If you can't find them, I'll gladly provide them and
you can see for yourself that you are again accusing me of something I
did not do.
you suggest that saying "one of Joseph Smiths spiritual wives"
might have some sexual connotation,
..........That has been suggested before on TT by other TTers, and the
moderator did nothing to discourage such comments. Now you want to ban
me from posting something other TTers can post with no retribution.
This is simply another example of a double standard.
you try to spin Dean up by suggesting he gets "excited" by
sexual references.
.........I merely stated the truth about Deans sensitivity to
such things. This was not an ad-hom attack. Is the truth now
a problem on TT? People have said a lot more vile things about me with
no condemnation by the moderator. Why the double standard now, Perry?
these amount to false accusations,
DAVEH: How can that possibly be a false accusation if
it is true, Perry? If anything, it is you who is making false
accusations about me in this matter. Once again....a TT double
standard.
the intentions of spinning Dean up on a banned topic
DAVEH: You are absolutely wrong again, Perry. You simply fail to
understand the nature of my posts. My intentions are not to spin up
Dean at all. It is you who I am trying to enlighten as to the
Christian hypocrisy involving the double standard practiced on TT with
regard to Mormons. Until you as the moderator recognize it,
why should I discontinue pointing it out every time it occurs? Is not
the TT double standard an acceptable discussion topic?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, you suggest I might have some knowledge of
Izzy's sexual experiences, then you suggest that saying "one of
Joseph Smiths spiritual wives" might have some sexual connotation,
then you try to spin Dean up by suggesting he gets
"excited" by sexual references. These amount to false
accusations, with the intentions of spinning Dean up on
a banned topic. Any more posts from you containing sexual
references and I will have to take you off the forum until you agree
not to do so. Take any issues you have up with me, offline, at this
address, not on the forum.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 07:29:32 -0800
* Please try to /refrain /from making sexual references, especially
/false accuastions/.*
DAVEH: Let's see if I understand this, Perry. Recently I asked some
questions that were no more sexually oriented than what you commonly
make, Dean then claimed foul......and you banned further discussion
based on the /perception /you and Dean had about what those comments
might have implied.
Now you have made a comment that can be perceived to be sexually
charged..........
*If lucky, you may become one of his many spirit wives! *
..........and you don't want to recognize the double standard? It is
interesting that when you or other TTers make any kind of denigrating
remarks toward LDS theology with sexual implications, nothing is
considered off limits. When I point out this obvious double standard,
I am cautioned by the moderator to /refrain /from bringing the
discussion to the TT table under the guise of making/ false
accusations/. It must be convenient to have a moderator who can see
non-LDS posters through one non-judgmental eye, and perceive a
completely different perspective of LDS posters through the other, more
critical eye. I suppose if one has an ax to grind against LDS
theology, and is not embarrassed to publicly admit such....then it
should not surprise anybody to find that person practicing a double
standard. The curious part about this is that it happens on a forum
called /TruthTalk/, where /truth /is presupposed to be the dominating
factor, yet it seems to be suppressed when it comes to recognizing the
Christian hypocrisy found here.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
* Please try to /refrain /from making sexual references, especially
/false accuastions/.* This is not the forum for that? I am sure there
are many discussion forums about sex if that type of discussion
interests you.
Perry
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Perry's Sexually Suggestive Comments
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:07:35 -0800
**If lucky, you may become one of his many spirit wives! **
DAVEH: I wonder if Dean is going to rebuke you for making such
sexually suggestive comments, Perry! If not, will we then have
another example of hypocritical Christianity in TT?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Just be sure you remember your secret password and secret handshake so
Joseph Smith will allow you entrance into heaven. *If lucky, you may
become one of his many spirit wives! *
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Signing off...
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:19:35 EST
I guess I never got to know you, Christine--but hope to meet you in the
great beyond--you may be required to testify at the Bar of God as to
what you
have seen and heard on TT--
Blainerb
In a message dated 12/11/2005 11:24:52 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am signing off. I have gotten sucked into the world of TT, and I
think it
would be beneficial to my GPA to bid adeiu. Thanks for all the
discussions. I
have learned a great deal. May the Lord bless you and keep you all.
It would be cool to meet you all in real life some day. But maybe not
all in
the same room. I wonder how that would turn out... :-)
-Christine Miller
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
|
