-------------- Original message --------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> JD wrote:
> > My question is this -- when we do disagree on a
> > passage of scripture -- who is right? You with
> > your doctrine of divine illumination? And when
> > you and Judy, believing the very same thing about
> > "spiritual discernment" disagree -- who is right in
> > that case?
>
> Obviously it depends upon the specific situation, but if I have received a
> divine illumination concerning a topic or passage of Scripture, I should not
> relinquish that understanding simply because someone else has a different
> perspective.You mean when someone else has a different illumination.
The work is to see how it fits in with the illlumintion
> received by others.So the "perspectives" recieved from illumination can be different from one person to the other , perhaps depending on that persons needs and where she is in terms of maturity (?)
So the answer to your last question usually is yes, I
> am the one who is right, but not to the exclusion of that truthful aspect
> shared by another.but apparently you do exclude the opinions or beliefs of others based upon what you consider to be "revealed (to you) truth. " You believe that we are still under law and I do not. I consider my point to be from God as surely as you do your opinion. I see a dfference between prophetical revelation and providential revelation. And in that context, especially providential illumination, you and I can have two very different view points that Godcan use to bring both of us into the ssame relationship with Him.
Sometimes separating truth from fiction is like
> whittling on a piece of wood.
>
> Please keep in mind also that Revelation / Illumination and Biblical
> Interpretation are not mutually exclusive.I have never thought otherwise -- in fact, I think they are the same thing.
Some people engage in both while
> others only engage in the latter. There are some, few, who engage only in
> the former.
>
> JD wrote:
> > If you cannot answer these question, the only
> > conclusion one can draw for the time being is
> > that the teaching on "spiritual discerment" versus
> > intellectual interpretation is a false teaching.
>
> I have answered your question, and am able to answer with many more words, You JUST NOW answered my question. And I not quite convinced it is an answer. Time will tell.
> but when you do not hear and understand the basics and choose to mock what
> few words I have shared already, the rest of the answer cannot be shared. There was nothing to mock until now, in this post, King David. It was a good post up to this point.
>
> Peace be with you.
> D avid Miller.
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how
> you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend
> who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> he will be subscribed.
- Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides knpraise
- Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides Charles Perry Locke
- Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides David Miller
- Re: [TruthTalk] Who deci... Lance Muir

