You say this: Of course, the
> Scriptures won't help if you are dealing with someone who is not a man of God. :-)
> Scriptures won't help if you are dealing with someone who is not a man of God. :-)
And you find this funny? You see this as a opportunity for a tongue in cheek defense? Well, this is getting ridiculous.
Ten four,
jd
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You just don't know me, JD. If I delivered the sentence in person, you
> would see a smile, and maybe even a laugh. I have to admit too that my
> tongue was pressed firmly against my cheek with that sentence before the
> smilie. I'm just trying to lighten things up a little.
>
> David Miller.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [email protected] ; [email protected]
> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 10:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
>
>
> Why in the world do you put a "happy face" behind a statment that you do not
> intend to be funny or even tongue in cheek? You do it often and it is
> never funny.
>
> jd
> -------------- Or iginal message --------------
> From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Wrong again, Lance. You have overlooked the very reason the Scriptures
> > have
> > been given to us. The Scriptures are profitable for reproof, for
> > correction, and for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may
> > be
> > perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. Of course, the
> > Scriptures won't help if you are dealing with someone who is not a man of
> > God. :-)
> >
> > You should consider taking up street preaching in your old age, Lance. It
> > would help you fulfill the following passage:
> >
> > Titus 1:9
> > (9) Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be
> > able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.
> >
> > David Miller.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > F rom: Lance Muir
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 1:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
> >
> >
> > Going to the Bible will NOT bring the issue to resolution, Dean. Judy, DM,
> > Gary, Bill, John, even I, though only on the rarest of occasions, can
> > muster
> > adequate Scriptural support for a 'view'. Sometimes that 'view' is God's.
> > Sometimes that 'view' is one's own.
> >
> > ---- Original Message -----
> > From: Dean Moore
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: January 15, 2006 12:57
> > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Lance Muir
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: 1/15/2006 12:31:45 PM
&g t; > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
> >
> >
> > EVERY VIEW IS SUPPORTABLE, DEAN!! The better 'taught' one is, the more <
> > BR>> comprehensive that person's presentation is. This applies equally to
> > right
> > as well as wrong views. IMO, your view is a wrong view on this matter..
> >
> > cd: That of course would make it wrong because it is in contrast to you
> > view?So how do we know which view is correct-go to the Bible-or some other
> > source?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Dean Moore
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: January 15, 2006 12:21
> > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
> >
> >
> > cd: Lance you need to recognize that this view is made up of much study
> > and
> > that I can support it with scripture so it is not something just spoke off
> > of the top of my head as you seem to suppose. If one is to evaluate the
> > speaker then one must also consider the speakers past statements to
> > determine the availability of truth offer by the speaker.Which statement
> > do
> > you want me to support?
> >
> & gt;
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Lance Muir
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: 1/15/2006 9:13:44 AM
> > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
> >
> >
> > Key:'I view'. Please take note as all conversations are similary
> > constructed
> > JT and DM.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Dean Moore
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: January 15, 2006 09:06
> > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
> >
> >
> > cd: I view the word "unbelief" to portray a larger image than what has
> > been
> > stated in this discussion. To have unbelief is not only to reject the
> > person
> > of Christ but to also reject his words which very clearly points one
> > towards
> > God's law and God's grace. So if John 3:18 is correct then one must
> > receive
> > this larger image if not on new birth then later at the bidding of the
> > Holy
> > Ghost. Note and point : One sin can send one to hell if there is refusal
> > of
> > compliance to the conviction power of the Spirit (1 Cor 6:9)-so be not
> > deceived-but sin can also make one least in the kingdom of heaven.This
> > speaks of a personal judgement between the person and God.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Judy Taylor
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Sent: 1/15/2006 8 :28:37 AM
> > Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
> >
> >
> > If this Victor person is correct and "UNBELIEF" is the predicament
> > humanity
> > is in then why was the Holy Spirit
> > sent to reprove the WORLD (note this is not just God's covenant ppl) of
> > SIN,
> > righteousness, and judgment?
> > (John 16:8) Why didn't God send Him as an antidote to "unbelief" only if
> > this is the main problem??
> >
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:50:35 -0500 "Lance Muir"
> > writes:
> >
> > ----- Original Messag e -----
> > From: Debbie Sawczak
> > To: 'Lance Muir'
> > Sent: January 14, 2006 17:02
> > Subject: OK, done working for now
> >
> >
> > paragraph in this lecture of Victor's:
> >
> > I've often said, too, that the hardest part of any service of worship for
> > th e minister is the children's story, because nearly all the children's
> > stories here are moralistic bromides. It's just moralistic bromide. And
> > the
> > Gospel isn't heard because we assume that children can't understand the
> > Gospel. They can be taught not to steal, and they can be taught not to
> > swear, but they can't understand the Gospel. This is ridiculous, but keep
> > your eye on the Christian education wing of your church or denomination,
> > because that's where the Gospel goes down.
> >
> > It strikes me that street preaching and children's sermons go down the
> > same
> > wrong path!
> >
> > Paragraph from next lecture:
> >
> > The protestant refor mers maintain that the root problem is Sin and it
> > gives
> > rise to sins. But be sure you know which is which, or you will never come
> > to
> > terms with the Gospel. Morality maintains that little "s" sins plural is
> > the
> > human predicament. The Gospel maintains that capital "S" Sin singular -
> > unbelief - is the predicament.
> >
> > This is the difference between David's understanding of repentance and
> > Bill's/JD's.
> >
> > D
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/229 - Release Date: 1/13/2006
> >
> > ----------
> > "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
> > know how
> > you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
> >
> > If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a
> > friend
> > who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > he will be subscribed.
>
> ----------
> "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how
> you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
>
> If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.. If you have a friend
> who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> he will be subscribed.
