On 2017-03-14 18:49, Khurram Shahzad wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Cédric Krier <[email protected]> wrote: > > But do you really need to track at stock level such product? > > Maybe you can see them as service. > > > > Yes, we do need to have stock level of consumables.
Then it is not consumable but simple goods because consumable means we do not care about the stock level. > In a hospital, > consumable vary from X-ray films to linen items and they must be recorded > as in-direct cost of sales. > > > > > > Now back on "department" stuff. What are you calling "department"? > > Are you talking about analytic? What kind of financial transactions are > > you expecting? > > > > > For example 'Radiology' and 'Nursing' are my departments. I issue 'X-ray > Films', 'Printer Cartridges' and 'Printing Papers' to Radiology department. > In hospital's income statement, I want to have an expense account 'indirect > cost of sales' which should be debited whenever Radiology departments gets > such items from store. But the expense is already recorded when you purchased the goods, except if you are doing anglo-saxon accounting. In that case, it seems we are missing a kind of internal invoice (or internal shipment) to register move the supplier cost to cogs. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20170314143752.GB55997%40tetsuo.
