On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Cédric Krier <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2017-03-14 18:49, Khurram Shahzad wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Cédric Krier <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > But do you really need to track at stock level such product? > > > Maybe you can see them as service. > > > > > > > Yes, we do need to have stock level of consumables. > > Then it is not consumable but simple goods because consumable means we > do not care about the stock level. > > > In a hospital, > > consumable vary from X-ray films to linen items and they must be recorded > > as in-direct cost of sales. > > > > > > > > > > Now back on "department" stuff. What are you calling "department"? > > > Are you talking about analytic? What kind of financial transactions are > > > you expecting? > > > > > > > > For example 'Radiology' and 'Nursing' are my departments. I issue 'X-ray > > Films', 'Printer Cartridges' and 'Printing Papers' to Radiology > department. > > In hospital's income statement, I want to have an expense account > 'indirect > > cost of sales' which should be debited whenever Radiology departments > gets > > such items from store. > > But the expense is already recorded when you purchased the goods, except > if you are doing anglo-saxon accounting. In that case, it seems we are > missing a kind of internal invoice (or internal shipment) to register > move the supplier cost to cogs. > Yes, we are using anglo-saxon accounting. You are absolutely right! How should I manage financial entry? I tried to accomplish this task using stock move but that does not make sense, I think! Regards, Khurram. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/CAM3N3CzhN3d-koJiQBXn%3DBAuq7BUYcR6Lq%2BgsDMFXCFpFdWw0A%40mail.gmail.com.
