On 14 de març de 2017 20.05.04 CET, "Cédric Krier" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 2017-03-14 22:18, Khurram Shahzad wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Cédric Krier <[email protected]> >wrote: >> >> > On 2017-03-14 18:49, Khurram Shahzad wrote: >> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Cédric Krier ><[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > > But do you really need to track at stock level such product? >> > > > Maybe you can see them as service. >> > > > >> > > >> > > Yes, we do need to have stock level of consumables. >> > >> > Then it is not consumable but simple goods because consumable means >we >> > do not care about the stock level. >> > >> > > In a hospital, >> > > consumable vary from X-ray films to linen items and they must be >recorded >> > > as in-direct cost of sales. >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Now back on "department" stuff. What are you calling >"department"? >> > > > Are you talking about analytic? What kind of financial >transactions are >> > > > you expecting? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > For example 'Radiology' and 'Nursing' are my departments. I issue >'X-ray >> > > Films', 'Printer Cartridges' and 'Printing Papers' to Radiology >> > department. >> > > In hospital's income statement, I want to have an expense account >> > 'indirect >> > > cost of sales' which should be debited whenever Radiology >departments >> > gets >> > > such items from store. >> > >> > But the expense is already recorded when you purchased the goods, >except >> > if you are doing anglo-saxon accounting. In that case, it seems we >are >> > missing a kind of internal invoice (or internal shipment) to >register >> > move the supplier cost to cogs. >> > >> >> Yes, we are using anglo-saxon accounting. You are absolutely right! >How >> should I manage financial entry? I tried to accomplish this task >using >> stock move but that does not make sense, I think! > >I guess we will need to have a new type of location for the product >consumed. And the anlgo-saxon module should create a cogs move when >internal shipment moves product to this location.
I think we can use moves with lost_found to_location in order to create this moves. IIRC lost_found is a valid to location for internal moves, isn't it? -- Enviado desde mi dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Por favor, disculpa mi brevedad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/259BEFA7-0B48-438B-AAB8-25F5224A3755%40koolpi.com.
