On 2017-08-09 10:27, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: > El 09/08/17 a les 10:05, Cédric Krier ha escrit: > > On 2017-08-09 09:41, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote: > >> El 08/08/17 a les 20:07, Cédric Krier ha escrit: > >>> On 2017-08-08 18:46, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote: > >>>> Ideally there should be a tax and this would improve some things. > >>>> However we aleady have +1000 taxes defined, so we need other changes > >>>> before we can use taxes only. > >>> You are in a Kafkaesque country or you are wrongly using the tax system. > >> We have a lot of taxes due to tax rules. Let me explain: > >> > >> Most of our tax rules are used to add one additional tax to the original > >> tax. In order to support this, we have a lot of taxes which have two > >> childs: The original tax + Tax Rule added tax. This is a product of two > >> lists of all taxes, which makes the list so huge. > >> > >> I haven't found any way to preserve the original tax when applying a tax > >> rule. Is this possible? > > > > Yes, just make TaxRuleLine.get_taxes return more than just the tax id. > > That's what I was wondering, current code have to be extended. > > > I will not be against a standard module that extend tax rule line to > > have a list of extra taxes. > > I'm wondering if it should not be included on the account module. As > it's only adding one field and not so much lines of code.
No, KISS. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20170809092843.GN3742%40kei.
