On 2017-08-09 09:41, Sergi Almacellas Abellana wrote:
> El 08/08/17 a les 20:07, Cédric Krier ha escrit:
> > On 2017-08-08 18:46, Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> >> Ideally there should be a tax and this would improve some things.
> >> However we aleady have +1000 taxes defined, so we need other changes
> >> before we can use taxes only.
> > You are in a Kafkaesque country or you are wrongly using the tax system.
> We have a lot of taxes due to tax rules. Let me explain:
> Most of our tax rules are used to add one additional tax to the original 
> tax. In order to support this, we have a lot of taxes which have two 
> childs: The original tax + Tax Rule added tax. This is a product of two 
> lists of all taxes, which makes the list so huge.
> I haven't found any way to preserve the original tax when applying a tax 
> rule. Is this possible?

Yes, just make TaxRuleLine.get_taxes return more than just the tax id.
I will not be against a standard module that extend tax rule line to
have a list of extra taxes.

Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"tryton" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to