On 2018-04-03 19:18, Richard PALO wrote: > Le 03/04/2018 à 18:54, Cédric Krier a écrit : > > On 2018-04-03 18:44, Richard PALO wrote: > >> Interestingly, article III.C.4 Avis CNC 174-1 - Les principes d'une > >> comptabilité régulière > >> found in the site of the Belgian CNC > >> http://www.cnc-cbn.be/files/advice/link/FR_174-01.htm > >> is quite similar to usages in France: > >>> Dans chaque journal, les écritures doivent être identifiées par un numéro > >>> séquentiel > >>> formant, le cas échéant par période comptable ou par exercice, une série > >>> continue. > >> Which quickly translated says that 'In each journal, the entries must be > >> identified by a > >> sequential number forming a continuous series, either by accounting period > >> or by fiscal year.' > > > > This ensured by the *Post Number* field. > > > > Perhaps I missed something, since when is the *post number* journal-specific?
It is not. I just point you that how this article is implemented. > But the point is, at least in France, in mode 'brouillard', the number is > consecutive upon initial entry. I never see any where such requirement for draft accounting. And it is quite logical because it would make loosing its meaning to draft accounting. > Post number is consecutive upon validation(posting) which may be somewhat an > arbitrary order. It is not arbitrary, it is chronological. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20180403214558.GL3910%40kei.
