On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 03:37:01AM +0100, Morten Nilsen wrote:
> Alain Fauconnet wrote:
> > The same box boots OK with RAID support compiled static, but well,
> > I like the dynamic way and I'd love to understand what's going on.
> 
> I just have to ask..
> what could you possibly gain from loading something as basic as the disk 
> drivers dynamically? .. aside from the whole calamity of booting 
> multible boxen using the same kernel image, which was brought up earlier

That's the precise point. Having a single .config file, same homegrown
kernel "package" (actually just a prebuilt kernel and a script to
install it into /boot and lilo.conf, in a tar.gz file)
for all my servers running TSL 2.2 that require a 2.6 kernel for h/w 
support.
Just making my life a bit easier...

> 
> > Trustix Linux 2.2
> > Kernel 2.6.15.4 compiled from source
> 
> If you are compiling 2.6 kernels, exactly why aren't you using TSL3?
> I just have to ask..

I've already explained this earlier: TSL 2.2 is our current standard
O/S for our server farm and TSL 3.0 will not be until:

- we've made TSL 2.2 *really* our one and only standard (still a few old RH 8.0 
or even 7.3
boxes lying around)
- the Trustix folks themselves designate 3.0 as the recommended,
production-grade, stable version (not the case last time I've checked)
- we have tested the compatibility of all our source-built apps,
utilities, homegrown scripts etc.
- I have trained myself on all the things that are new in 3.0, and
convinced myself that the things I currently dislike in 3.0 are 
actually OK and it's "just me"
- we have a roll-out plan

> 
> > Mkinitrd 4.1.18-2 RPM from FC3 installed in place
> 
> why in heavens name would you take an rpm from FC3? use the TSL3 rpm 
> instead..

Well, I'd love to, but what's the name of the RPM that has mkinitrd in TSL 3.0
please? I don't see anything called mkinitrd at
http://http.trustix.org/pub/trustix/releases/trustix-3.0/i586/trustix/rpms/

Greets,
_Alain_
_______________________________________________
tsl-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss

Reply via email to