Alain Fauconnet wrote: >> If you are compiling 2.6 kernels, exactly why aren't you using TSL3? >> I just have to ask.. > > I've already explained this earlier: TSL 2.2 is our current standard > O/S for our server farm and TSL 3.0 will not be until:
Ah, so it was you.. a bit unclear on one point though.. if you use TSL 2.2 because that is the current stable etc. why would you touch the kernel? :p >>> Mkinitrd 4.1.18-2 RPM from FC3 installed in place >> why in heavens name would you take an rpm from FC3? use the TSL3 rpm >> instead.. > > Well, I'd love to, but what's the name of the RPM that has mkinitrd in TSL 3.0 > please? I don't see anything called mkinitrd at > http://http.trustix.org/pub/trustix/releases/trustix-3.0/i586/trustix/rpms/ manually grabbed from; http://http.trustix.org/pub/trustix/releases/trustix-3.0/i586/trustix/rdfs/resources.rdf <rdf:li parseType="Resource"> <spi:name>mkinitrd</spi:name> <rdf:Bag> <rdf:li parseType="Provider"> <spi:name>tsl-initrd</spi:name> <spi:version>0.0.9</spi:version> <spi:release>6tr</spi:release> <spi:uri>packages/tsl-initrd-0.0.9-6tr.i586.rpm.rdf</spi:uri> </rdf:li> </rdf:Bag> </rdf:li> swup is a nice tool .. you can even search from the website these days.. http://www.trustix.org/component/option,com_wrapper/Itemid,67/ -- Morten :wq _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
