Matthias, On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:47:45PM +0100, Matthias Subik wrote: > hi, > I have another question: > why are your using raidrun, not mdadm?? > tsl2.2 had mdadm last time i checked it emails me if I loose a drive ... > > m > > On 15.03.2006, at 06:07, Alain Fauconnet wrote: > > "raidrun ..."
Where did you pick up that word? I don't think it appears anywhere in my posting. The original sentence was: ``I get "raidautorun: RAID_AUTORUN failed: 19" when nash runs "raidautorun /dev/md0" at boot'' 'raidautorun' is nash's internal command used only in initrd boot scripts and is unrelated to 'mdadm' or the old 'raidstart' commands (has there even been a 'raidrun' command? not that I know). 'mdadm' and 'raidstart' run from the real root filesystem after it is mounted. 'raidautorun' runs from initrd precisely to get the root filesystem mounted. It's built in nash, the 'boot shell' that is part of the initrd image. I used 'mdadm' (from a boot CD) to create my RAID MDs, of course. But when you build an initrd image (even with the stock mkinitrd TSL 2.2 RPM) the 'raidautorun' command will be used inside, you don't control this. Seems to me you're mixing the initrd and 'post root mount' environments. Greets, _Alain_ _______________________________________________ tsl-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trustix.org/mailman/listinfo/tsl-discuss
