On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 17:44, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
> "Stanley,Michael P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> >> groupId is whatever someone chooses it to be. in the case of
> >> commons-collections, the groupId is commons-collections.
> 
> >But that's kind of my point, this isn't scalable.  A Project ID is not
> >necessarily unique.  The large the repository grows the more
> >unmanageable it will become.  
> 
> Jason didn't understand this in the pre4 time frame. What makes you
> think that suddently he changed his mind?

That simply isn't true. Where do you get these things from? I'm fully
cognizant of what is involved in making this scalable. As I've said time
and time again nothing of a distributed nature will be possible until
the real collection of POMs happens and a mechanism that reflects the
support for multiple repositories is in place for POMs that can't be
pushed into the public eye.

> The whole "everything in one repository on the planet" approach is
> flawed. 

I never said I wanted the only repository to be the one at Ibiblio.
Clearly evidenced by support for more than one repository and the active
search for other mirrors. You claim yourself to use repositories other
than Ibiblio. But a single cohesive reference repository is necessary.
That doesn't mean it has to be the only repository. I would urge you to
refrain from commenting on things you don't fully understand and I'm
trying to be polite this time because you're going all out on the FUD.

> That's what I'm saying for four month now. 

What have you been saying for four months? 

> And Jason gave me a
> "whiner" label because of that.

Henning, I'm sorry but you do tend to complain a lot about things you
either don't understand and it's primarily because you don't ask any
questions. As a result you spread misinformation and I therefore tend to
get highly pissed off with you and then I ignore you.

Yes, the documentation should be better but I have started adding to it
and it's been getting better, possibly even approaching moderately
useful.

So try again and explain to me what you have been saying for four months
and I will try to answer it this time. I'm not sure what is limiting
your ability to build. I thought you did just fine with your own
corporate repository.

>       Regards
>               Henning
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org

In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
  
  -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to