John McNally wrote: > On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 16:34, Scott Eade wrote: > > >>But... Doesn't Maven use Jira? >> >>Should we ultimately be going for a consistent solution, at across all of >>the turbine projects? > > > I think Jason became frustrated as the primary maintainer with the early > version that was first tried. As scarab is very configurable and > possibly difficult to administer as well as missing some important > features. He thought Jira was open source when the decision was made to > use it. I think he (and the rest of the maven crew) will be persuaded > to use scarab, but I don't see any reason to force the issue. Since they > have a working issue tracker, the switch can wait until they have seen > the latest scarab and are comfortable with its progress. > > Let's get it going for torque and then add the rest in due time.
+1 don't forget turbine-2, turbine-3, fulcrum and tdk ;-) martin > > john mcnally > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
