Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On 7/2/01 4:04 PM, "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I installed TDK 2.1 on my Win 2k machine using Sun JDK 1.3.1
> > and Oracle 8i. I got almost everything to work (although the
> > two step install is a bit confusing). The performance of each
> > request was abismal. I am used to sub-second responses when
> > the server and the browser are on the same machine. The problem
> > is that each request was taking 1.5 to 3 seconds on my machine.
>
> You sure you didn't download 2.1b4? There is a problem with
> Catalina in that TDK. The response time on my machine is pretty
> quick and I have a PII/300Mhz machine. I assume you are using
> Apache Bench? I will run some tests on my machine.
I downloaded the version that is linked to on the web site today.
My responses weren't measured, but they were noticeably slower than
using Cocoon for the same thing.
> > I am running Win2k with an Athlon 750 and 256MB of RAM. My JDK
> > is set to use 256MB on startup. I am using the Catalina (Tomcat 4)
> > that comes in the TDK.
> >
> > Can someone please clue me in as to what the performance problem
> > might be? The pages produced by Turbine are not that complex.
>
> There was a performance problem with the TDKs previous to
> the 2.1 final. I assume that's what the problem is.
I _think_ I have 2.1 final.
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
