On 7/2/01 4:56 PM, "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kasper Nielsen wrote:
>>
>> try setting module.cache=true in your TurbineResource.Properties
>> and see if the second time you hit a page is just as slow as the first.
>
> That worked. But all this tells me is that Turbine is architecturally
> slow, and the cache hides the problems.
I think Cocoon2 vs Turbine 2.2 would be more of a fair fight :-)
A lot of cruft has been removed in HEAD and is already faster.
I try to get some numbers together for turbine 2.1 and 2.2.
> Cocoon that does far more complex
> things is fast even without cache activated. It becomes even quicker after
> cache is enabled.
>
> Since this does get me in the tollerable range, I can move on with
> development.
>
>>
>> - Kasper
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 10:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: Performance of sample app
>>
>>> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 7/2/01 4:04 PM, "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I installed TDK 2.1 on my Win 2k machine using Sun JDK 1.3.1
>>>>> and Oracle 8i. I got almost everything to work (although the
>>>>> two step install is a bit confusing). The performance of each
>>>>> request was abismal. I am used to sub-second responses when
>>>>> the server and the browser are on the same machine. The problem
>>>>> is that each request was taking 1.5 to 3 seconds on my machine.
>>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
