I run the 2.1 final TDK on win2k on a PIII 500 (sun jdk 1.3.0) and performance is very
fast (sub second). My
module cache is turned off.
Could it be the fact that you start the VM with your entire RAM as the heap size ?? I
don't know a lot about
that kind of stuff but it sounds excessive... my setup just uses the normal jdk
settings and performs fine.
Age
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Berin Loritsch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >
> > On 7/2/01 4:04 PM, "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I installed TDK 2.1 on my Win 2k machine using Sun JDK 1.3.1
> > > and Oracle 8i. I got almost everything to work (although the
> > > two step install is a bit confusing). The performance of each
> > > request was abismal. I am used to sub-second responses when
> > > the server and the browser are on the same machine. The problem
> > > is that each request was taking 1.5 to 3 seconds on my machine.
> >
> > You sure you didn't download 2.1b4? There is a problem with
> > Catalina in that TDK. The response time on my machine is pretty
> > quick and I have a PII/300Mhz machine. I assume you are using
> > Apache Bench? I will run some tests on my machine.
>
> I downloaded the version that is linked to on the web site today.
> My responses weren't measured, but they were noticeably slower than
> using Cocoon for the same thing.
>
> > > I am running Win2k with an Athlon 750 and 256MB of RAM. My JDK
> > > is set to use 256MB on startup. I am using the Catalina (Tomcat 4)
> > > that comes in the TDK.
> > >
> > > Can someone please clue me in as to what the performance problem
> > > might be? The pages produced by Turbine are not that complex.
> >
> > There was a performance problem with the TDKs previous to
> > the 2.1 final. I assume that's what the problem is.
>
> I _think_ I have 2.1 final.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
