Kevin A. Burton [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> So what are the plans here?
>
> In one way I think that turbine has been very successfull. We have
> attracted a lot of developers and it appears to be developing at a solid
> pace.
>
> However we have violated the central OSS philosophy of "release early,
> release often". I want to use this on actual project but can't really
> talk it up because the code is only available in CVS.
>
Ditto.
> Jon mentioned on the jetspeed mailing list that we were 2 months from a
> release. This is *bad* IMO.
>
> I am +1 on getting a Turbine 1.0 out now even if it is missing some
> packages (OPL?) that are in development.
>
> Thoughts?
>
+1, especialy before we wreak havoc with the service model re-design. Also,
the distribution build probably shouldn't have OPaL compiled in until it's
fully functionally (i.e., has a ClassMap loader, which may/can/should be
dependent on the new service model).
(OT: As a non-committer, do I have voting rights?)
> --
> Kevin A Burton
> Senior Software Engineer
> Kendara Inc
> http://www.kendara.com
> Mobile: 408-910-6145
> Linux - The revolution will NOT be televised
>
--
Christopher Elkins
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
