>on 4/19/00 12:06 AM, Chris Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> http://www.ultratask.com/turbine-patches-2000041801.txt > >Why was the abstract removed on the class signature? I had that there for a >reason to force people to extend these classes. Because I didn't declared the 'doBuild' methods to be abstract until everything is switched over... eases the transition... >Also, I think you missed @deprecated on some of the methods... The 'build' methods are not really deprecated, only redefined. ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: basewebmacroscreen John McNally
- Re: basewebmacroscreen jon *
- Re: basewebmacroscreen dave bryson
- Re: basewebmacroscreen jon *
- [PATCH] Changes Assemblers to use Template pattern Chris Meyer
- Potential problem when cookies are disabled Chris Meyer
- Re: Potential problem when cookies are disabled jon *
- Re: Potential problem when cookies are disabled Chris Meyer
- Re: Potential problem when cookies are disabled jon *
- Re: [PATCH] Changes Assemblers to use Template pattern jon *
- RE: [PATCH] Changes Assemblers to use Template pattern Chris Meyer
- RE: [PATCH] Changes Assemblers to use Template pattern Frank Kim
- Re: [PATCH] Changes Assemblers to use Template pattern jon
- RE: [PATCH] Changes Assemblers to use Template pattern Frank Kim
- RE: [PATCH] Changes Assemblers to use Template pattern Frank Kim
- Re: [PATCH] Changes Assemblers to use Template pattern jon *
- Re: [PATCH] Changes Screen building to use Template pattern jon *
