on 8/7/2000 1:35 PM, "Daniel Brahneborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I understand that, and guess I got a bit too frustrated. *ashamed*
>
> The point is, it would probably be easier to get more commercial Turbine
> users if there was some list of sites that were known to use it, like
> the list that PHP has. More users is good, no?
At this point, we are in a serious development phase without even having a
release or decent up-to-date documentation. So, in a sense, more users is
bad. More contributors working on it is good though.
> There are none of each, actually. We will use consultants in either
> case, at least for a start.
Ok, going down the trail of conversation...so do these consultants have
experience in ASP or Java or both...in other words, pick a technology that
you can actually get people to do the work on.
> I've already tried that, but thanks anyway. :)
I'm sorry, but there are plenty of .com jobs out there right now that need
Java servlet experts.
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
