Re: MS Windows batch files

[Rafal Krzewski]

"Daniel L. Rall" wrote:
> Sorry to repeat myself, but I think that this got buried.
> Should the MS Windows batch files be written for Win9x or WinNT/2000 (I
> assume that NT == 2000 as far as shell differences go), or is there some
> trick for writing them cross-OS?

AFAIK Win9x .bat files work fine under NT. I really don't know about NT
shell, but probably it has some feturest that plain ol' DOS doesn't.
That makes me I think we should stick with 9x compatibility.

Rafal


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]