At 02:44 PM 8/24/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>Sorry to repeat myself, but I think that this got buried.
>Should the MS Windows batch files be written for Win9x or WinNT/2000 (I
>assume that NT == 2000 as far as shell differences go), or is there some
>trick for writing them cross-OS?
I think the only things that are really needed to write cross OS are:
1 - Watch out for long command lines. 95/98 have a limit of something
awful like 128 characters.
2 - Make sure you use short path names/file names. Ie ecs-1.3.3.jar turns
into
ECS-13~1.JAR. (Use dir /x to get the short file name/directory names)
I'm not aware of any other major differences between the batch files. But
I hope this helps.
-Mike
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Didier Dubois
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Daniel L. Rall
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Didier Dubois
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- MS Windows batch files Daniel L. Rall
- Re: MS Windows batch files Rafal Krzewski
- Re: MS Windows batch files Daniel L. Rall
- Re: MS Windows batch files Christopher Elkins
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Michael Rimov
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Rafal Krzewski
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- no perl Jon Stevens
- Re: no perl Rafal Krzewski
- Re: no perl Didier Dubois
- Re: no perl Jon Stevens
- Re: no perl Frank Conradie
- Re: no perl Didier Dubois
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Frank Conradie
- [torque] mysql foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
