Rafal Krzewski wrote:
>
> "Daniel L. Rall" wrote:
> > Sorry to repeat myself, but I think that this got buried.
> > Should the MS Windows batch files be written for Win9x or WinNT/2000 (I
> > assume that NT == 2000 as far as shell differences go), or is there some
> > trick for writing them cross-OS?
>
> AFAIK Win9x .bat files work fine under NT. I really don't know about NT
> shell, but probably it has some feturest that plain ol' DOS doesn't.
> That makes me I think we should stick with 9x compatibility.
I know of at least one difference between NT and 9x; NT's shell has a
variable which contains all command line arguments (like $@ in a UNIX
shell), while 9x does not.
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://collab.net/ | open source | do the right thing
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
