> Sorry to repeat myself, but I think that this got buried. > Should the MS Windows batch files be written for Win9x or WinNT/2000 (I > assume that NT == 2000 as far as shell differences go), or is there some > trick for writing them cross-OS? > -- > I am not aware of any special considerations necessary to ensure cross-OS compatability. Can you elaborate? The jakarta-ant and jakarta-tomcat batch files work fine on both 9x and NT/2000. > Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://collab.net/ | open source | do the right thing > -- Christopher Elkins ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Rafal Krzewski
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Didier Dubois
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Daniel L. Rall
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Didier Dubois
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- MS Windows batch files Daniel L. Rall
- Re: MS Windows batch files Rafal Krzewski
- Re: MS Windows batch files Daniel L. Rall
- Re: MS Windows batch files Christopher Elkins
- Re: MS Windows batch files Michael Rimov
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Rafal Krzewski
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Jon Stevens
- no perl Jon Stevens
- Re: no perl Rafal Krzewski
- Re: no perl Didier Dubois
- Re: no perl Jon Stevens
- Re: no perl Frank Conradie
- Re: no perl Didier Dubois
- Re: [torque] foreign primary keys Frank Conradie
